IgA rheumatoid factor as a serological predictor of poor response to tumour necrosis factor α inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis

Aim The main objective of this study is to elucidate the role of immunoglobulin A (IgA) rheumatoid factor (RF) in predicting the clinical response to tumour necrosis factor α inhibitors (TNFi) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Method We recruited all patients with RA who were ever on TN...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of rheumatic diseases Vol. 17; no. 8; pp. 872 - 877
Main Authors Sakthiswary, Rajalingham, Shaharir, Syahrul S., Mohd Said, Mohd S., Asrul, Abdul W., Shahril, Nor S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aim The main objective of this study is to elucidate the role of immunoglobulin A (IgA) rheumatoid factor (RF) in predicting the clinical response to tumour necrosis factor α inhibitors (TNFi) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Method We recruited all patients with RA who were ever on TNFi for a minimum duration of 3 months at our centre. Based on the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria, subjects were further divided into responders and non‐responders. Age‐matched RA patients who were on conventional disease‐modifying anti‐rheumatic drugs and in remission were enrolled as controls. Subjects were tested for quantitative values of IgA, IgM, IgG RF and anti‐citrulinated cyclic peptides (CCP). Further, all subjects were assessed for the disease activity score that includes 28 joints (DAS28) and Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) 8‐item Disability Index (HAQ‐DI). Results A total of 31 subjects with RA who had received TNFi and 15 controls were enrolled in this study. There was a trend for the non‐responders (n = 10) to have higher levels of all isotypes of RF and anti‐CCP. However, only the IgA RF and anti‐CCP levels were significantly higher in the non‐responder group compared to the responders and controls (P = 0.001, P = 0.034, respectively). On multivariate analysis, only the IgA RF remained significant (OR 0.989; 95% CI 0.980–0.999; P = 0.026). Conclusion IgA RF is potentially a novel predictor of response to TNFi in RA patients. Testing for pretreatment IgA RF levels could be a reasonable consideration before commencement of TNFi.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-F3995J2W-C
istex:43D170C54FB50A2EC7CBCE4C4CC3FB7D6CF293AA
APLAR Research Grant Award 2013
ArticleID:APL12443
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1756-1841
1756-185X
1756-185X
DOI:10.1111/1756-185X.12443