Bank Directors' Perceptions of Expanded Auditor's Reports

Subsequent to the financial crisis, standard setters developed suggestions for enhancing the audit function, in order to increase financial stability. One related idea is to expand the audit report disclosed to the public, to ensure that it is fit for purpose. This study investigates the impact of e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of auditing Vol. 20; no. 2; pp. 158 - 174
Main Authors Boolaky, Pran Krishansing, Quick, Reiner
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Subsequent to the financial crisis, standard setters developed suggestions for enhancing the audit function, in order to increase financial stability. One related idea is to expand the audit report disclosed to the public, to ensure that it is fit for purpose. This study investigates the impact of expanded audit reports, namely information on the assurance level, materiality levels and key audit matters (KAM), on bank director perceptions of the quality of the financial statements, the audit and the audit report, as well as on their credit approval decisions. We conduct an experiment involving a sample of 105 bank directors and use ANCOVA to determine the predictors of bank director perceptions and decisions. Our findings suggest that disclosing the assurance level has a significantly positive impact. In contrast, we cannot demonstrate a material effect of expanding the audit report to include the materiality level or KAM. As a consequence, standard setters should carefully analyse the effect of additional information before making decisions on expanding the content of the audit report. Such expansions are not necessarily perceived as useful by stakeholders.
Bibliography:ArticleID:IJAU12063
istex:63E6587AD0D24C7634F990F11D5BFC63FE3916BD
ark:/67375/WNG-KJFHVK32-H
ISSN:1090-6738
1099-1123
DOI:10.1111/ijau.12063