Role of the GLT-1 subtype of glutamate transporter in glutamate homeostasis: the GLT-1-preferring inhibitor WAY-855 produces marginal neurotoxicity in the rat hippocampus

Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system and is tightly regulated by cell surface transporters to avoid increases in concentration and associated neurotoxicity. Selective blockers of glutamate transporter subtypes are sparse and so knock‐out animals and antise...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe European journal of neuroscience Vol. 21; no. 12; pp. 3217 - 3228
Main Authors Selkirk, Julie V., Nottebaum, Lisa M., Vana, Alicia M., Verge, Gail M., Mackay, Kenneth B., Stiefel, Theodore H., Naeve, Greg S., Pomeroy, Jordan E., Petroski, Robert E., Moyer, John, Dunlop, John, Foster, Alan C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.06.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system and is tightly regulated by cell surface transporters to avoid increases in concentration and associated neurotoxicity. Selective blockers of glutamate transporter subtypes are sparse and so knock‐out animals and antisense techniques have been used to study their specific roles. Here we used WAY‐855, a GLT‐1‐preferring blocker, to assess the role of GLT‐1 in rat hippocampus. GLT‐1 was the most abundant transporter in the hippocampus at the mRNA level. According to [3H]‐l‐glutamate uptake data, GLT‐1 was responsible for approximately 80% of the GLAST‐, GLT‐1‐, and EAAC1‐mediated uptake that occurs within dissociated hippocampal tissue, yet when this transporter was preferentially blocked for 120 h with WAY‐855 (100 µm), no significant neurotoxicity was observed in hippocampal slices. This is in stark contrast to results obtained with TBOA, a broad‐spectrum transport blocker, which, at concentrations that caused a similar inhibition of glutamate uptake (10 and 30 µm), caused substantial neuronal death when exposed to the slices for 24 h or longer. Likewise, WAY‐855, did not significantly exacerbate neurotoxicity associated with simulated ischemia, whereas TBOA did. Finally, intrahippocampal microinjection of WAY‐855 (200 and 300 nmol) in vivo resulted in marginal damage compared with TBOA (20 and 200 nmol), which killed the majority of both CA1–4 pyramidal cells and dentate gyrus granule cells. These results indicate that selective inhibition of GLT‐1 is insufficient to provoke glutamate build‐up, leading to NMDA receptor‐mediated neurotoxic effects, and suggest a prominent role of GLAST and/or EAAC1 in extracellular glutamate maintenance.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-BHGKGVP5-T
ArticleID:EJN4162
istex:C34F2018DE5F755F93FF8A001803EDFD40CA07E8
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0953-816X
1460-9568
DOI:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04162.x