Large variations in the ratio of effective breeding and census population sizes between two species of pond-breeding anurans

The viability of wild populations is frequently assessed by monitoring adult census sizes (Nc). This approach is particularly useful for pond-breeding amphibians, because assemblages during the breeding season are relatively easy to detect and count. However, it is the genetic effective population s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiological journal of the Linnean Society Vol. 89; no. 2; pp. 365 - 372
Main Authors BREDE, EDWARD G, BEEBEE, TREVOR J.C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.10.2006
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The viability of wild populations is frequently assessed by monitoring adult census sizes (Nc). This approach is particularly useful for pond-breeding amphibians, because assemblages during the breeding season are relatively easy to detect and count. However, it is the genetic effective population size (Ne) or surrogates such as effective breeding population size (Nb) that are of primary importance for long-term viability. Although Nc estimates of one anuran amphibian (Bufo bufo) in Britain were much larger than those of another (Rana temporaria) at the same sites, the ratios of Nb to Nc were much smaller in B. bufo than in R. temporaria. These differences were sufficiently great as to reverse the effective size order at one site, such that Nb for R. temporaria was larger than that for B. bufo. Differences in adult sex ratios at breeding sites probably contributed to lower Nb values in B. bufo populations compared with those of R. temporaria. The relationship of Nb to Nc can therefore vary dramatically even between similar species, to the extent that just monitoring Nc can give misleading impressions of relative effective breeding sizes and thus of population viability. It will be increasingly important to estimate Ne or Nb in wildlife populations for assessment of conservation priorities.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00680.x
istex:C6AC0C00F421DAEAF4685E10C0D668142B6944B3
ark:/67375/WNG-BBHR0JTC-D
ArticleID:BIJ680
Current address: Max Planck Institut fur Limnologie, Tropical Ecology Working Group, August‐Thienemenn‐Strasse, Postfach 165, 224306 Ploen, Germany
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0024-4066
1095-8312
DOI:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00680.x