Simultaneous quantification of fentanyl, sufentanil, cefazolin, doxapram and keto‐doxapram in plasma using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

• Published in: Biomedical chromatography Vol. 32; no. 10; pp. e4290 - n/a
• Main Authors: Flint, Robert B., Bahmany, Soma, Nagel, Bart C. H., Koch, Birgit C. P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England John Wiley and Sons Inc 01.10.2018
• Subjects: cefazolin; Cefazolin - blood; Cefazolin - chemistry; Cefazolin - pharmacokinetics; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods; doxapram; Doxapram - blood; Doxapram - chemistry; Doxapram - pharmacokinetics; Drug Stability; fentanyl; Fentanyl - analogs & derivatives; Fentanyl - blood; Fentanyl - chemistry; Fentanyl - pharmacokinetics; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Limit of Detection; Linear Models; Prospective Studies; Reproducibility of Results; sufentanil; Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods; UPLC–MS/MS; sufentanil; doxapram; UPLC-MS/MS; cefazolin; fentanyl
• ISSN: 0269-3879; 1099-0801
• DOI: 10.1002/bmc.4290

A simple and specific UPLC–MS/MS method was developed and validated for simultaneous quantification of fentanyl, sufentanil, cefazolin, doxapram and its active metabolite keto‐doxapram. The internal standard was fentanyl‐d5 for all analytes. Chromatographic separation was achieved with a reversed‐phase Acquity UPLC HSS T3 column with a run‐time of only 5.0 min per injected sample. Gradient elution was performed with a mobile phase consisting of ammonium acetate or formic acid in Milli‐Q ultrapure water or in methanol with a total flow rate of 0.4 mL min−1. A plasma volume of only 50 μL was required to achieve adequate accuracy and precision. Calibration curves of all five analytes were linear. All analytes were stable for at least 48 h in the autosampler. The method was validated according to US Food and Drug Administration guidelines. This method allows quantification of fentanyl, sufentanil, cefazolin, doxapram and keto‐doxapram, which is useful for research as well as therapeutic drug monitoring, if applicable. The strength of this method is the combination of a small sample volume, a short run‐time, a deuterated internal standard, an easy sample preparation method and the ability to simultaneously quantify all analytes in one run.