Experience with 7.0 T MRI in Patients with Supratentorial Meningiomas

Meningiomas are typically diagnosed by their characteristic appearance on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, detailed image findings regarding peri- and intra-tumoral anatomical structures, tumor consistency and vascularity are very important in pre-surgical planning and surgica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Korean Neurosurgical Society Vol. 59; no. 4; pp. 405 - 409
Main Authors Song, Sang Woo, Son, Young Don, Cho, Zang-Hee, Paek, Sun Ha
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) The Korean Neurosurgical Society 01.07.2016
대한신경외과학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2005-3711
1598-7876
DOI10.3340/jkns.2016.59.4.405

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Meningiomas are typically diagnosed by their characteristic appearance on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, detailed image findings regarding peri- and intra-tumoral anatomical structures, tumor consistency and vascularity are very important in pre-surgical planning and surgical outcomes. At the 7.0 T MRI achieving ultra-high resolution, it could be possible to obtain more useful information in surgical strategy. Four patients who were radiologically diagnosed with intracranial meningioma in 1.5 T MRI underwent a 7.0 T MRI. Three of them underwent surgery afterwards, and one received gamma knife radiosurgery. In our study, the advantages of 7.0 T MRI over 1.5 T MRI were a more detailed depiction of the peri- and intra-tumoral vasculature and a clear delineation of tumor-brain interface. In the safety issues, all patients received 7.0 T MRI without any adverse event. One disadvantage of 7.0 T MRI was the reduced image quality of skull base lesions. 7.0 T MRI in patients with meningiomas could provide useful information in surgical strategy, such as the peri-tumoral vasculature and the tumor-brain interface.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
G704-001031.2016.59.4.009
ISSN:2005-3711
1598-7876
DOI:10.3340/jkns.2016.59.4.405