Real-life evaluation of a human immunodeficiency virus screening algorithm using a single combined p24 antigen–antibody assay

Since May 2010, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening in France has been performed using a single combined fourth-generation assay. One of our major concerns is to verify that this screening strategy is able to diagnose HIV primary infection as soon as possible. Thus, the sensitivity and spec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases Vol. 32; no. 3; pp. 425 - 430
Main Authors Fanmi, A. N., Ramière, C., Tardy, J. C., André, P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 01.03.2013
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Since May 2010, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening in France has been performed using a single combined fourth-generation assay. One of our major concerns is to verify that this screening strategy is able to diagnose HIV primary infection as soon as possible. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity of this strategy were evaluated on 49,623 serum samples, including 29 primary infections, received for routine HIV testing between September 2010 and November 2011. Specimens were screened using the Enzygnost HIV Integral II enzyme-linkedimmunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit. All positive sera, according to the manufacturer’s recommendations [signal-to-cutoff ratio (S/CO) ≥ 1] were retested using the Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo. Moreover, we defined a grey zone (0.5 < S/CO < 1) and sera within this grey zone were retested using the VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra test and HIV-1 RNA was checked by the Abbott RealTime PCR kit. Screening tests were positive for all primary infections. All samples within the grey zone proved VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra and HIV-1 RNA negative. Overall, the ELISA test sensitivity and specificity were 100 and 99.79 %, respectively. The false-positive rate was higher when S/CO was in the low range (1 to 5). Adding a second screening test for positive sera reduced the false-positive rate from 0.20 to 0.02 %. HIV screening with a single combined assay did not miss any documented primary infection during this evaluation period, even without extending the positivity zone.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0934-9723
1435-4373
DOI:10.1007/s10096-012-1760-1