Mathematically reduced reaction mechanisms applied to adiabatic flat hydrogen/air flames

Several hydrogen/air reaction systems are reduced mathematically to one-step schemes, using the method introduced by Maas and Pope [1]. The reduction is obtained by assuming fast reaction groups of the reaction system to be in steady state. We developed a method to apply the reduced schemes to adiab...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCombustion and flame Vol. 100; no. 4; pp. 559 - 570
Main Authors Eggels, R.L.G.M., de Goey, L.P.H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.03.1995
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Several hydrogen/air reaction systems are reduced mathematically to one-step schemes, using the method introduced by Maas and Pope [1]. The reduction is obtained by assuming fast reaction groups of the reaction system to be in steady state. We developed a method to apply the reduced schemes to adiabatic flat flames. The results are compared with those of detailed chemistry calculations. The accuracy of the results of reduction of the most simple reaction system, (which does not include the species HO 2 and H 2O 2) is quite well. The other reaction systems, however, give appreciable errors in burning velocity. This is mainly caused by large deviations in HO 2 mole fractions between reduced and full scheme calculations, while the reaction rate and the burning velocity are sensitive to variations in the mole fraction of HO 2. Considering the time scales of the reaction system and the time scales of convection and diffusion it is shown that at low temperatures, where the mole fraction of HO 2 reaches its maximum, the basic assumptions applied to reduce the mechanisms are not justified. It is concluded that the hydrogen/air system can only be reduced to an accurate one-step reduced scheme, if reaction schemes without HO 2 and H 2O 2 are used. This reduction technique also indicates, in accordance with conclusions of Peters et al. [3], that a two-step reduced scheme has to be used if more realistic hydrogen/air schemes, including HO 2 and H 2O 2, are considered.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0010-2180
1556-2921
DOI:10.1016/0010-2180(94)00108-5