The Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value in microsatellite instability–high metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) yielded unprecedented efficacy in patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)–high metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Since the Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) is a blood-based biomarker with prognostic usefulness in mCRC, it might predict clinical outcom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of cancer (1990) Vol. 150; pp. 155 - 167
Main Authors Corti, Francesca, Lonardi, Sara, Intini, Rossana, Salati, Massimiliano, Fenocchio, Elisabetta, Belli, Carmen, Borelli, Beatrice, Brambilla, Marta, Prete, Alessandra A., Quarà, Virginia, Antista, Maria, Fassan, Matteo, Morano, Federica, Spallanzani, Andrea, Ambrosini, Margherita, Curigliano, Giuseppe, de Braud, Filippo, Zagonel, Vittorina, Fucà, Giovanni, Pietrantonio, Filippo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2021
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) yielded unprecedented efficacy in patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)–high metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Since the Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) is a blood-based biomarker with prognostic usefulness in mCRC, it might predict clinical outcomes and primary resistance to ICIs. We retrospectively analysed the association of PIV and its early modulation at 3/4 weeks after treatment initiation with the outcomes of MSI-high mCRC patients receiving anti-programmed death-(ligand)1 (PD-[L]1) +/− anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) agents. PIV was calculated as follows: (neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count)/lymphocyte count. PIV cut-offs were determined using the maximally selected rank statistics. A total of 163 patients were included. In the multivariable models for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), both high (>492) baseline PIV (OS: adjusted [a] HR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.49–6.04, p = 0.002; PFS: aHR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.06–3.44, p = 0.031) and early PIV increase ≥+30% (OS: aHR, 3.21; 95% CI, 1.65–6.23, p < 0.001; PFS: aHR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.30–3.89, p = 0.003) confirmed an independent prognostic impact. After stratifying patients according to baseline PIV and ICI regimen, OS and PFS were significantly worse in subjects with high PIV receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Early PIV increase was an independent predictor of clinical benefit (aOR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08–0.66; p = 0.007), whereas a trend was observed for baseline PIV (aOR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.10–1.07; p = 0.065). PIV is a strong predictor of outcomes in MSI-high mCRC patients receiving ICIs. Prospective validation of these results is required to establish its role as a stratification factor for personalised combination strategies. •PIV is a composite immune-inflammation biomarker with prognostic usefulness in mCRC.•High baseline PIV identifies MSI-high mCRC patients with poorer outcomes upon ICIs.•Early PIV increase ≥+30% at 3/4 weeks independently correlates with poor OS and PFS.•Subjects with high PIV receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy have worse OS and PFS.•Baseline PIV and early PIV variation correlate with primary ICIs resistance.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0959-8049
1879-0852
1879-0852
DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.043