Comparison of Telbivudine and Entecavir Therapy on Nephritic Function and Drug Resistance in Patients with Hepatitis B Virus-Related Compensated Cirrhosis
Background: To compare the impact of telbivudine (LDT) and entecavir (ETV) administration on nephritic function. Method: One hundred thirty patients diagnosed with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related compensated cirrhosis were randomly divided into LDT (600 mg/d) or ETV (0.5 mg/d) groups. Results: The d...
Saved in:
Published in | Cellular physiology and biochemistry Vol. 40; no. 1-2; pp. 370 - 378 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Basel, Switzerland
Cell Physiol Biochem Press GmbH & Co KG
01.01.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background: To compare the impact of telbivudine (LDT) and entecavir (ETV) administration on nephritic function. Method: One hundred thirty patients diagnosed with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related compensated cirrhosis were randomly divided into LDT (600 mg/d) or ETV (0.5 mg/d) groups. Results: The drug resistance rate was higher following LDT treatment compared to ETV treatment (16.9% vs. 1.5%, P=0.0006). The mean creatinine level decreased compared to baseline in the LDT group (0.81 vs. 0.94 mg/dl, P=0.000). The change in median glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) compared to baseline in the LTD and ETV groups was 22.3 and -3.3, respectively, at 2 years (P=0.000). In patients with mild nephritic injury (eGFR< 90 ml/min/1.73m 2 ), the median eGFR increased by 28.0 ml/min/1.73m 2 in the LDT group and decreased by 4.3 ml/min/1.73m 2 in the ETV group (p=0.000). The eGFR in 88.5% of patients (23/26) from the LDT group increased > 90 ml/min/1.73m 2 . The percentage of patients with an eGFR > 90 ml/min/1.73m 2 increased from 60.0% to 92.3% in the LDT group and from 64.6% to 69.2% in the ETV group. Conclusion: In patients with HBV-related compensated cirrhosis, LDT treatment was more effective in protecting nephritic function and was associated with a higher drug resistance rate, but did not contribute to a better outcome compared with ETV treatment. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1015-8987 1421-9778 |
DOI: | 10.1159/000452552 |