Toward a taxonomy of concept designs for improved robustness

The term 'robust design' denotes various engineering methods intended to make a product's function more consistent despite variations in the environment, manufacturing, deterioration, and customer use patterns. Most robust design methods are employed at the detailed design stage, but...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of engineering design Vol. 18; no. 2; pp. 139 - 156
Main Authors Jugulum, Rajesh, Frey, Daniel D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Taylor & Francis 01.04.2007
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The term 'robust design' denotes various engineering methods intended to make a product's function more consistent despite variations in the environment, manufacturing, deterioration, and customer use patterns. Most robust design methods are employed at the detailed design stage, but the benefits derived may be significantly higher if efforts are made earlier in the design process so that the design concept itself is inherently capable of being made robust. To make progress toward these ends, we studied a large number of inventions documented by US patents that claimed robustness as a key advantage over the prior art. We grouped these patents on the basis of the general strategies they employed. We found that the strategies can be usefully organized via the P-diagram. This paper will describe a few of these strategies by means of examples and explain the relationship of the strategies to the P-diagram.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0954-4828
1466-1837
DOI:10.1080/09544820600731496