Influences of salinity and shade on seedling photosynthesis and growth of two mangrove species, Rhizophora mangle and Bruguiera sexangula, introduced to Hawaii

• Published in: Aquatic botany Vol. 77; no. 4; pp. 311 - 324
• Main Authors: Krauss, Ken W, Allen, James A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.12.2003
• Subjects: Brackish; Bruguiera sexangula; Carbon assimilation; Invasion biology; Light response curves; Marine; Photosynthesis; Rhizophora mangle; Salt sensitivity; Shade tolerance; ISE, USA, Hawaii, Oahu I; USA, Hawaii; Salt sensitivity; Shade tolerance; Light response curves; Rhizophora mangle; Bruguiera sexangula; Carbon assimilation; Invasion biology; Photosynthesis
• ISSN: 0304-3770; 1879-1522
• DOI: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2003.08.004

Rhizophora mangle was first introduced to Hawaii in 1902 to promote shoreline stabilization. Intertidal competition with native and introduced salt marsh species was low, and beyond the early 1920s, mangrove forests expanded rapidly. An additional mangrove species, Bruguiera sexangula, was introduced in 1922 and currently co-occurs with R. mangle in only a few stands on the north shore and windward sides of Oahu. Where the two species overlap, R. mangle, having colonized intertidal zones first, forms nearly monospecific forest stands. To determine why R. mangle remains the dominant mangrove, we initiated a greenhouse study to compare seedling growth and photosynthetic light response of both species growing at two light levels and contrasting salinity regimes (2, 10, 32 PSU). The asymptotic nature of B. sexangula’s assimilation response is indicative of stomatal regulation, whereas only light level appears to regulate photosynthesis in R. mangle. Shifts in patterns of biomass allocation and physiological response indicate two contrasting strategies relative to sunlight and salinity. B. sexangula’s strategy is characterized by slow growth with little variation under favorable conditions and morphological plasticity under stressful conditions, which allows for adjustments in carbon gain efficiency (morphological strategy). On the other hand, R. mangle’s strategy involves faster growth under a wide range of environmental conditions with physiological enhancement of carbon assimilation (physiological strategy). Low salinity combined with reduced light, or simply low sunlight alone, appears to favor R. mangle and B. sexangula equally. High salinity places greater, but not overwhelming, stress on B. sexangula seedlings, but tends to favor R. mangle at higher light levels.