Is an electric field always a promoter of wetting? Electro-dewetting of metals by electrolytes probed by in situ X-ray nanotomography

We developed a special electrochemical cell enabling quantitative analysis and in situ X-ray nanotomography of metal/electrolyte interfaces subject to corrosion. Using this cell and applying the nodoid model to describe menisci formed on tungsten wires during anodization, the evolution of the electr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFaraday discussions Vol. 199; pp. 11 - 114
Main Authors Nave, Maryana I, Gu, Yu, Karen Chen-Wiegart, Yu-Chen, Wang, Jun, Kornev, Konstantin G
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Royal Society of Chemistry 01.07.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We developed a special electrochemical cell enabling quantitative analysis and in situ X-ray nanotomography of metal/electrolyte interfaces subject to corrosion. Using this cell and applying the nodoid model to describe menisci formed on tungsten wires during anodization, the evolution of the electrolyte surface tension, the concentration of reaction products, and the meniscus contact angle were studied. In contrast to the electrowetting effect, where the applied electric field decreases the contact angle of electrolytes, anodization of the tungsten wires increases the contact angle of the meniscus. Hence, an electric field favors dewetting rather than wetting of the newly formed surface. The discovered effect opens up new opportunities for the control of wetting phenomena and calls for the revision of existing theories of electrowetting.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
SC0012704; AC02-98CH10886
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES)
BNL-203471-2018-JAAM
ISSN:1359-6640
1364-5498
1364-5498
DOI:10.1039/c6fd00239k