Disrupting the Ethical Imperatives of “Junior” Critical Qualitative Scholars in the Era of Conservative Modernization

• Published in: Qualitative inquiry Vol. 17; no. 7; pp. 571 - 588
• Main Authors: Pasque, Penny A., Carducci, Rozana, Gildersleeve, Ryan Evely, Kuntz, Aaron M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.09.2011; SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
• Subjects: Careers; Conservatism; Cooperation; Critical Theory; Development; Dialogue; Discourse; Discussion; Ethics; Friendship; Interpersonal Communication; Methodology; Modernization; Qualitative analysis; Research Methodology; Scholarship; Social Change; methodology; dialogue; critical inquiry
• ISSN: 1077-8004; 1552-7565
• DOI: 10.1177/1077800411409878

In this article, we wrestle with the core issue of how early career researchers translate central tenets and core concepts of critical theory and critical methodology into their research practice. By way of creative representation, we draw from bell hooks and Cornel West’s (1991) written rendition of their verbal dialogue in Breaking Bread: Insurgent Black Intellectual Life. Their hope was to offer the book in a dialogic format in such a way that mirrored the synergy in their verbal discussions as friends and intellectual colleagues. In a similar vein, we hope to share with readers the synergy and depth of the narratives that have transpired during our ongoing discussions on the important topic of critical praxis as part of a collaborative research group called the Disruptive Dialogue Project (Gildersleeve, Kuntz, Pasque & Carducci, 2010; Kuntz, Pasque, Carducci, & Gildersleeve, 2009).