The social organization of free-ranging fish shoals

• Published in: Oikos Vol. 89; no. 3; pp. 546 - 554
• Main Authors: Hoare, Daniel J., Ruxton, Graeme D., Godin, Jean-Guy J., Krause, Jens
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copenhagen Munksgaard 01.06.2000; Munksgaard International Publishers, Ltd; Blackwell
• Subjects: Agnatha and pisces; Animal ethology; Biological and medical sciences; Body length; Datasets; Fish; Freshwater; Freshwater fishes; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Fundulus diaphanus; Infections; Parasites; Parasitism; Phenotypes; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Schools of fish; Shoals; Vertebrata; Canada; North America; America; Freshwater environment; School(aquatic animal); Fidelity; Vertebrata; Phenotype; Social behavior; Social group; Pisces; Lakes; Social organization; Temperate zone
• ISSN: 0030-1299; 1600-0706
• DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890314.x

The phenotypic composition of social groups can affect the foraging efficiency and predation risk of their individual members. In shoaling fishes, active choice of shoal companions on the basis of phenotypic characters such as body length has been reported. In this study, we investigated the phenotypic composition of free-ranging, multi-species fish shoals in a temperate freshwater lake. We collected 21 entire shoals, each consisting of up to four species and comprising 3622 fish in total. Shoals were strongly assorted by species, body length, parasite prevalence and parasite load. Using a mark-recapture procedure involving 785 banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus), we found no evidence for shoal fidelity or site fidelity, as individuals from different shoals mixed extensively after just 24 h and ranged all over the study site irrespective of initial capture locations. Killifish showed strong changes in shoal-size choice over 24 h, and no evidence was found that shoals might break up into sub-units of individuals that are more phenotypically assorted than their original shoals. The mechanisms by which assortative groups may arise and the consequences of low group fidelity for the evolution of cooperative behaviour are discussed.