Orange peel-derived pectin jelly and corn starch-based biocomposite film with layered silicates

ABSTRACT Orange peel‐derived pectin jelly/corn starch‐based biocomposite films with and without layered silicates (LSs) were prepared using melt extrusion followed by film die casting. To enhance interfacial compatibility, corn starch and LSs were chemically modified. Regardless of chemical modifica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of applied polymer science Vol. 131; no. 16; pp. np - n/a
Main Authors Çokaygil, Zerrin, Banar, Müfide, Seyhan, A. Tuğrul
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, NJ Blackwell Publishing Ltd 15.08.2014
Wiley
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT Orange peel‐derived pectin jelly/corn starch‐based biocomposite films with and without layered silicates (LSs) were prepared using melt extrusion followed by film die casting. To enhance interfacial compatibility, corn starch and LSs were chemically modified. Regardless of chemical modification or LS weight content, different pectin jelly‐to‐starch weight ratios (63/37, 60/40, 57/43, and 54/46) were considered to formulate the ingredients of biocomposite films in light of Taguchi‐based predictions. X‐ray diffraction (XRD), fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), scanned electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were systematically used to characterize corn starch, LSs, and biocomposite films. Among all the films considered, pectin jelly/modified (15%) starch‐based biocomposite film (54/46 w/w) containing 0.25 wt % of pristine LSs was found to be the most promising in terms of texture structure and mechanical integrity. Furthermore, creep recovery, hydrophobicity, and water vapor and oxygen gas transmission rates of the most promising biocomposite film were experimentally determined. Based on the findings obtained, the overall performance of the biocomposite film was evaluated and weighed against the overall performance of a low‐density polyethylene film. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131, 40654.
Bibliography:ArticleID:APP40654
Anadolu University Scientific Research Projects Commission - No. 1003F106
ark:/67375/WNG-J7XBCZHM-V
istex:DB69E1DE3C5B8EFCC8340197A6719BDE48BE7CBD
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0021-8995
1097-4628
DOI:10.1002/app.40654