Comparative Genetic Characterization of Pathogenic Escherichia coli Isolated from Patients and Swine Suffering from Diarrhea in Korea

The aim of this study was to compare the virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance of the most common pathogenic strains in swine and patients with diarrhea in Korea. We examined virulence genes and antimicrobial susceptibility in 85 and 61 strains isolated from swine and patients with diarrhea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnimals (Basel) Vol. 13; no. 7; p. 1154
Main Authors Do, Kyung-Hyo, Seo, Kwangwon, Jung, Myunghwan, Lee, Woo-Kon, Lee, Wan-Kyu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 24.03.2023
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The aim of this study was to compare the virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance of the most common pathogenic strains in swine and patients with diarrhea in Korea. We examined virulence genes and antimicrobial susceptibility in 85 and 61 strains isolated from swine and patients with diarrhea, respectively. The most prevalent pathogen in swine was enterotoxigenic (ETEC) (47.1%), followed by Shiga toxin-producing (STEC) (32.9%). Similarly, the majority of the patient isolates (50.8%) were proven to be STEC, the most common pathotype, followed by ETEC (23.0%). We found that swine isolates had significantly higher resistance than patient isolates, especially to fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin: 37.5% and 16.1%; norfloxacin: 29.7% and 16.1%, respectively). Additionally, sequence type (ST) 100 (swine: 21; patients: 4), ST 1 (swine: 21, patients: 2), ST 10 (swine: 8; patients: 6), ST 641 (swine: 3, patients: 2), and ST 88 (swine: 2, patients: 11) were detected in both swine and humans. In addition, we confirmed that isolates from swine and patients had similar virulence traits and were phylogenetically similar. According to these findings, swine and humans are susceptible to cross infection and the transfer of antimicrobial resistance.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2076-2615
2076-2615
DOI:10.3390/ani13071154