Finding Dental Harm to Patients through Electronic Health Record-Based Triggers

Patients may be inadvertently harmed while undergoing dental treatments. To improve care, we must first determine the types and frequency of harms that patients experience, but identifying cases of harm is not always straightforward for dental practices. Mining data from electronic health records is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJDR clinical and translational research Vol. 5; no. 3; p. 271
Main Authors Walji, M F, Yansane, A, Hebballi, N B, Ibarra-Noriega, A M, Kookal, K K, Tungare, S, Kent, K, McPharlin, R, Delattre, V, Obadan-Udoh, E, Tokede, O, White, J, Kalenderian, E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.07.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Patients may be inadvertently harmed while undergoing dental treatments. To improve care, we must first determine the types and frequency of harms that patients experience, but identifying cases of harm is not always straightforward for dental practices. Mining data from electronic health records is a promising means of efficiently detecting possible adverse events (AEs). We developed 7 electronic triggers (electronic health record based) to flag patient charts that contain distinct events common to AEs. These electronic charts were then manually reviewed to identify AEs. Of the 1,885 charts reviewed, 16.2% contained an AE. The positive predictive value of the triggers ranged from a high of 0.23 for the 2 best-performing triggers (failed implants and postsurgical complications) to 0.09 for the lowest-performing triggers. The most common types of AEs found were pain (27.5%), hard tissue (14.8%), soft tissue (14.8%), and nerve injuries (13.3%). Most AEs were classified as temporary harm (89.2%). Permanent harm was present in 9.6% of the AEs, and 1.2% required transfer to an emergency room. By developing these triggers and a process to identify harm, we can now start measuring AEs, which is the first step to mitigating harm in the future. A retrospective review of patients' health records is a useful approach for systematically identifying and measuring harm. Rather than random chart reviews, electronic health record-based dental trigger tools are an effective approach for practices to identify patient harm. Measurement is one of the first steps in improving the safety and quality of care delivered.
ISSN:2380-0852
DOI:10.1177/2380084419892550