Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication: Preferences of Individuals With Locked-in Syndrome

• Published in: Neurorehabilitation and neural repair Vol. 35; no. 3; pp. 267 - 279
• Main Authors: Branco, Mariana P., Pels, Elmar G. M., Sars, Ruben H., Aarnoutse, Erik J., Ramsey, Nick F., Vansteensel, Mariska J., Nijboer, Femke
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.03.2021
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Brain-Computer Interfaces; Communication Aids for Disabled; Disease Progression; Female; Health Communication; Humans; Locked-In Syndrome - rehabilitation; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Preference; Qualitative Research; Time Factors; User-Computer Interface; locked-in syndrome; user-centered design; communication; brain-computer interface; opinion
• ISSN: 1545-9683; 1552-6844
• DOI: 10.1177/1545968321989331

Background Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have been proposed as an assistive technology (AT) allowing people with locked-in syndrome (LIS) to use neural signals to communicate. To design a communication BCI (cBCI) that is fully accepted by the users, their opinion should be taken into consideration during the research and development process. Objective We assessed the preferences of prospective cBCI users regarding (1) the applications they would like to control with a cBCI, (2) the mental strategies they would prefer to use to control the cBCI, and (3) when during their clinical trajectory they would like to be informed about AT and cBCIs. Furthermore, we investigated if individuals diagnosed with progressive and sudden onset (SO) disorders differ in their opinion. Methods We interviewed 28 Dutch individuals with LIS during a 3-hour home visit using multiple-choice, ranking, and open questions. During the interview, participants were informed about BCIs and the possible mental strategies. Results Participants rated (in)direct forms of communication, computer use, and environmental control as the most desired cBCI applications. In addition, active cBCI control strategies were preferred over reactive strategies. Furthermore, individuals with progressive and SO disorders preferred to be informed about AT and cBCIs at the moment they would need it. Conclusions We show that individuals diagnosed with progressive and SO disorders preferred, in general, the same applications, mental strategies, and time of information. By collecting the opinion of a large sample of individuals with LIS, this study provides valuable information to stakeholders in cBCI and other AT development.