Implications of gill arch movements for filter-feeding: an X-ray cinematographical study of filter-feeding white bream (Blicca bjoerkna) and common bream (Abramis brama)

• Published in: Journal of experimental biology Vol. 191; no. 1; pp. 257 - 282
• Main Authors: VAN DEN BERG, C, VAN DEN BOOGAART, J. G. M, SIBBING, F. A, OSSE, J. W. M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge Company of Biologists 01.06.1994; The Company of Biologists Ltd
• Subjects: Abramis brama; Biochemistry; Biological and medical sciences; Blicca bjoerkna; Cyprinidae; Diverse techniques; Experimental Animal Morphology and Cell Biology; Experimentele diermorfologie en celbiologie; Fish; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Marine; Molecular and cellular biology; Respiratory system; WIAS; X-rays; Freshwater environment; Water; Vertebrata; Gill; Filtering; Pisces; Cinematography; Measurement method; Abramis brama; Feeding
• ISSN: 0022-0949; 1477-9145
• DOI: 10.1242/jeb.191.1.257

Previous research shows that the reducible-channel model of filter-feeding can probably be applied to common bream, but not to white bream. According to this model, zooplankton are retained in the channels between the medial gill rakers; the mesh size of the sieve can be reduced by lowering the lateral rakers of the neighbouring gill arch into these channels. Gill arch movements may well disturb this mechanism; the depressed lateral gill rakers will move in and out of the medial channels and also shift out of their centre. We have quantified these disturbances by measuring the gill arch movements during filter-feeding in white bream and common bream, using dorsal X-ray films. In both species, the lateral rakers are long enough to bridge the gill slits. It was expected that common bream, which can reduce their channels, would have considerably less shift out of the channel centre than white bream, which cannot reduce their channels. However, the predicted shift is 40­50 % of the channel width in white bream and 75 % in common bream. A new, dynamic retention mechanism is proposed for common bream. According to this hypothesis, once a particle is trapped in a reduced channel, the channel walls release mucus and the particle becomes sticky. Hence, particles need to be retained mechanically only during part of the gulping cycle. According to the hypothesis, this is achieved by sideways rotation of the lateral rakers in combination with their tapering shape. Retention mechanisms with interdigitating rakers are expected chiefly in facultative filter-feeders, because such mechanisms are easily disturbed by gill arch movements.