Effects of outcome-driven insurance reimbursement on short-term weight control

CONTEXT: Although most health insurers exclude coverage of weight control therapy, one local insurer offered partial reimbursement of the cost of a weight control program, using an incentive plan. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether outcome-driven insurer-based reimbursement improves participation in a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational Journal of Obesity Vol. 27; no. 11; pp. 1423 - 1429
Main Authors Hubbert, K.A, Bussey, B.F, Allison, D.B, Beasley, T.M, Henson, C.S, Heimburger, D.C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basingstoke Nature Publishing Group 01.11.2003
Nature Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:CONTEXT: Although most health insurers exclude coverage of weight control therapy, one local insurer offered partial reimbursement of the cost of a weight control program, using an incentive plan. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether outcome-driven insurer-based reimbursement improves participation in a weight control program and short-term weight loss outcomes. DESIGN: Cohort follow-up study between January 1998 and February 2001. SETTING: Community weight management program operated by an academic medical center. SUBJECTS: Obese participants who had the potential for reimbursement (Group A, n=25) and participants in the same program classes (Group B, n=100) who had no possibility for reimbursement. Subjects in Group B were selected from among 206 potential participants using a propensity score to match them with subjects in Group A on age, gender, ethnicity, starting BMI, starting weight, and educational, economic, and demographic variables. INTERVENTION: Group lifestyle-based weight management program. The insurer reimbursed half the cost of the program to obese participants who met minimum weight criteria, paid the program fee at enrollment, attended >=10 of the 12 classes, and lost >=6% of initial body weight after 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participation rates and weight loss outcomes. RESULTS: Group A subjects attended significantly more classes (mean±s.d.: 10.1±1.8 vs 8.2±2.5, P<0.001) and lost more weight than Group B subjects (6.1±3.1 vs 3.7±3.6%, P=0.002). While 84% of Group A subjects attended >=10 classes, only 37% of Group B subjects did so (P<0.001); 56% of Group A subjects lost >=6% of body weight, but only 20% of Group B subjects did so (P<0.001); 56% of Group A subjects achieved both the class attendance and weight loss goals, but only 14% of Group B subjects did so (P<0.001). Logistic regression estimated that Group A subjects had 8.2 times the odds of attending >=10 classes and 4.5 times the odds of losing >=6% of body weight of Group B subjects, after controlling for class attendance. >CONCLUSIONS: Insurer-based reimbursement that is contingent upon initial financial commitment on the part of the patient, consistent program participation, and successful weight loss is associated with significantly better short-term weight control outcomes.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802403
ISSN:0307-0565
1476-5497
DOI:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802403