Comparison of conventional culture methods and FTA filtration-nested PCR for the detection of Shigella boydii and Shigella sonnei on tomato surfaces
Detection of Shigella boydii UI02 and Shigella sonnei UI05 artificially inoculated onto tomatoes was evaluated using enrichment protocols of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) and the American Public Health Association's Compendium of Methods fo...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of food protection Vol. 68; no. 8; pp. 1606 - 1612 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Des Moines, IA
International Association of Milk, Food and Environmental Sanitarians
01.08.2005
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Detection of Shigella boydii UI02 and Shigella sonnei UI05 artificially inoculated onto tomatoes was evaluated using enrichment protocols of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) and the American Public Health Association's Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Food (CMMEF), enrichment in Enterobacteriaceae enrichment (EE) broth supplemented with 1.0 microgram/ml novobiocin and incubated at 42 degrees C, and FTA filtration-nested PCR. To assess the effect of natural tomato microflora on recovery, conventional culture enrichments were repeated using rifampin-adapted inocula and enrichment medium supplemented with 50 microgram/ml rifampin. The lowest detection levels for S. boydii UI02 were >5.3 x 10(5) (BAM, CMMEF, and EE broth) and 6.2 CFU per tomato (FTA filtration-nested PCR). For S. sonnei UI05, the lowest detection levels were 1.9 x 10(1) (BAM), 1.5 x 10(3) (CMMEF), 1.1 x 10(1) (EE broth), and 7.4 CFU per tomato (FTA filtration-nested PCR). Natural tomato microflora had a large impact on recovery of S. sonnei UI05 and completely inhibited recovery of S. boydii UI02. EE broth was inhibitory to S. boydii UI02. FTA filtration-nested PCR provided superior detection (P < 0.05) compared with the conventional culture enrichment protocols. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0362-028X 1944-9097 |
DOI: | 10.4315/0362-028X-68.8.1606 |