Behavioral responses of California sea lions to mid-frequency (3250–3450 Hz) sonar signals

Military sonar has the potential to negatively impact marine mammals. To investigate factors affecting behavioral disruption in California sea lions (Zalophus californianus), fifteen sea lions participated in a controlled exposure study using a simulated tactical sonar signal (1 s duration, 3250–345...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMarine environmental research Vol. 92; pp. 268 - 278
Main Authors Houser, Dorian S., Martin, Stephen W., Finneran, James J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2013
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Military sonar has the potential to negatively impact marine mammals. To investigate factors affecting behavioral disruption in California sea lions (Zalophus californianus), fifteen sea lions participated in a controlled exposure study using a simulated tactical sonar signal (1 s duration, 3250–3450 Hz) as a stimulus. Subjects were placed into groups of three and each group received a stimulus exposure of 125, 140, 155, 170, or 185 dB re: 1 μPa (rms). Each subject was trained to swim across an enclosure, touch a paddle, and return to the start location. Sound exposures occurred at the mid-point of the enclosure. Control and exposure sessions were run consecutively and each consisted of ten, 30-s trials. The occurrence and severity of behavioral responses were used to create acoustic dose–response and dose–severity functions. Age of the subject significantly affected the dose–response relationship, but not the dose–severity relationship. Repetitive exposures did not affect the dose–response relationship. •Sea lions show a dose–response relationship to increasing levels of sound exposure.•The severity of the response also increases directly with sound pressure level.•Sea lions did not demonstrate desensitization across repetitive exposures.•Age of the sea lion was a significant factor affecting the dose–response function.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0141-1136
1879-0291
1879-0291
DOI:10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.10.007