Strength prediction of adhesive joints after cyclic moisture conditioning using a cohesive zone model

► Moisture uptake in an adhesive is shown to be dependent on moisture history. ► Cyclic moisture uptake has been predicted incorporating moisture history effects. ► The predicted moisture field has been coupled with a moisture dependent cohesive zone model. ► The methodology has been used to predict...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEngineering fracture mechanics Vol. 78; no. 16; pp. 2746 - 2760
Main Authors Mubashar, A., Ashcroft, I.A., Critchlow, G.W., Crocombe, A.D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.11.2011
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:► Moisture uptake in an adhesive is shown to be dependent on moisture history. ► Cyclic moisture uptake has been predicted incorporating moisture history effects. ► The predicted moisture field has been coupled with a moisture dependent cohesive zone model. ► The methodology has been used to predict failure in moisture conditioned adhesive joints. This paper presents a methodology to predict the strength of adhesive joints under variable moisture conditions. The moisture uptake in adhesive joints was determined using a history dependent moisture prediction methodology where diffusion coefficients were based on experimental cyclic moisture uptake of bulk adhesive samples. The predicted moisture concentrations and moisture diffusion history were used in a structural analysis with a cohesive zone model to predict damage and failure of the joints. A moisture concentration and moisture history dependent bilinear cohesive zone law was used. The methodology was used to determine the damage and failure in aluminium alloy – epoxy adhesive single lap joints, conditioned at 50 °C and good predictions of failure load were observed. The damage in the adhesive joints decreased the load carrying capacity before reaching the failure load and a nonlinear relationship between the load and displacement was observed. Changes in crack initiation and crack propagation were also observed between different types of joints. The presented methodology is generic and may be applied to different types of adhesive joint and adhesive.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0013-7944
1873-7315
DOI:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.07.010