Thickness effect of ultra-thin Ta2O5 resistance switching layer in 28 nm-diameter memory cell

Resistance switching (RS) devices with ultra-thin Ta 2 O 5 switching layer (0.5–2.0 nm) with a cell diameter of 28 nm were fabricated. The performance of the devices was tested by voltage-driven current—voltage (I-V) sweep and closed-loop pulse switching (CLPS) tests. A Ta layer was placed beneath t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScientific reports Vol. 5; no. 1; p. 15965
Main Authors Park, Tae Hyung, Song, Seul Ji, Kim, Hae Jin, Kim, Soo Gil, Chung, Suock, Kim, Beom Yong, Lee, Kee Jeung, Kim, Kyung Min, Choi, Byung Joon, Hwang, Cheol Seong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 03.11.2015
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Resistance switching (RS) devices with ultra-thin Ta 2 O 5 switching layer (0.5–2.0 nm) with a cell diameter of 28 nm were fabricated. The performance of the devices was tested by voltage-driven current—voltage (I-V) sweep and closed-loop pulse switching (CLPS) tests. A Ta layer was placed beneath the Ta 2 O 5 switching layer to act as an oxygen vacancy reservoir. The device with the smallest Ta 2 O 5 thickness (0.5 nm) showed normal switching properties with gradual change in resistance in I-V sweep or CLPS and high reliability. By contrast, other devices with higher Ta 2 O 5 thickness (1.0–2.0 nm) showed abrupt switching with several abnormal behaviours, degraded resistance distribution, especially in high resistance state and much lower reliability performance. A single conical or hour-glass shaped double conical conducting filament shape was conceived to explain these behavioural differences that depended on the Ta 2 O 5 switching layer thickness. Loss of oxygen via lateral diffusion to the encapsulating Si 3 N 4 /SiO 2 layer was suggested as the main degradation mechanism for reliability and a method to improve reliability was also proposed.
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/srep15965