Anterior tibial displacement on preoperative stress radiography of ACL-injured knee depending on knee flexion angle

Abstract Purpose To compare side-to-side difference (SSD) of anterior tibial translation in instrumented stress radiography for each series of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured subjects according to knee flexion angle. Methods Forty subjects who were suspected of having significant ACL injury...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inKnee Surgery and Related Research, 31(0) Vol. 31; no. 1; pp. 1 - 14
Main Authors Noh, Jung Ho, Nam, Woo Dong, Roh, Young Hak
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central 18.12.2019
BMC
대한슬관절학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Purpose To compare side-to-side difference (SSD) of anterior tibial translation in instrumented stress radiography for each series of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured subjects according to knee flexion angle. Methods Forty subjects who were suspected of having significant ACL injury by manual Lachman test and MRI were recruited for this prospective study. These subjects took stress radiographs for both knees with corresponding knee flexion of 10° (series M1) and 30° (series M2) using Telos stress device. Mean SSDs of M1 and M2 were compared. Sensitivities of M1 and M2 were assessed using the SSD ≥ 3 mm or ≥ 5 mm as a cutoff value. Results Mean SSDs in series M1 and M2 were 4.22 ± 3.72 mm and 3.25 ± 3.30 mm, respectively ( p  < 0.001). When 3 mm of SSD was used as a cutoff value, sensitivities of series M1 and M2 were 47.5% (19/40) and 32.5% (13/40), respectively ( p  = 0.171). When 5 mm of SSD was used as a cutoff value, sensitivities of series M1 and M2 were 45.0% (18/40) and 22.5% (9/40), respectively ( p  = 0.033). Conclusions Anterior tibial translation on stress radiographs using a Telos device is more prominent when knee flexion angle is 10° compared to that when knee flexion angle is 30°. However, stress radiography using Telos device, either at 10° or 30° of knee flexion, might not be suitable to make decision on surgical treatment due to relatively low sensitivities.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2234-2451
2234-0726
1225-1623
2234-2451
DOI:10.1186/s43019-019-0014-2