Comparison of ionisation measurements in water and polystyrene for electron beam dosimetry

For the determination of absorbed dose to water in electron beams, dosimetry protocols advocate ionisation measurements in plastic phantoms instead of water for practical reasons. The chamber readings in polystyrene at the depth of maximum ionisation must be corrected for the difference in physical...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysics in medicine & biology Vol. 30; no. 10; pp. 1043 - 1053
Main Authors Bruinvis, I A D, Heukelom, S, Mijnheer, B J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bristol IOP Publishing 01.10.1985
Institute of Physics
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:For the determination of absorbed dose to water in electron beams, dosimetry protocols advocate ionisation measurements in plastic phantoms instead of water for practical reasons. The chamber readings in polystyrene at the depth of maximum ionisation must be corrected for the difference in physical properties between the two materials. This correction factor was determined for a Farmer 0.6 cm3 graphite-walled chamber in electron beams with mean energies at the phantom surface between 6 and 19 MeV. Experiments with white polystyrene yielded corrections for the measured ionisation ranging from 0.3 to 2.4%. For clear polystyrene, 0.6-1% higher corrections were found. For beams with the same mean energy at the phantom surface, but with different beam-flattening and collimation systems, variations in this correction up to 1.2% were observed. In contrast to recent reports on electrical charge storage in polystyrene due to electron irradiation, our experiments do not show differences in the chamber readings any larger than 0.5%.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0031-9155
1361-6560
DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/30/10/003