Indispensability of Pelvic and Paraaortic Lymphadenectomy in Endometrial Cancers

• Published in: Gynecologic oncology Vol. 64; no. 3; pp. 411 - 417
• Main Authors: Yokoyama, Yoshihito, Maruyama, Hidetoshi, Sato, Shigemi, Saito, Yoshiharu
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: San Diego, CA Elsevier Inc 01.03.1997; Elsevier
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aorta, Abdominal; Biological and medical sciences; Endometrial Neoplasms - mortality; Endometrial Neoplasms - pathology; Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery; Female; Female genital diseases; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics; Humans; Lymph Node Excision - methods; Lymphatic Metastasis; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Prognosis; Retroperitoneal Neoplasms - mortality; Retroperitoneal Neoplasms - secondary; Retroperitoneal Neoplasms - surgery; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Survival Rate; Tumors; Human; Carcinoma; Prognosis; Stage classification; Malignant tumor; Metastasis; Female genital diseases; Lymphadenectomy; Pelvic ganglion; Surgery; Uterine diseases; Paraaortic ganglion; Endometrium
• ISSN: 0090-8258; 1095-6859
• DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1996.4573

The purposes of this study were to analyze the relationship between retroperitoneal lymph node (RLN) metastasis and clinical and pathologic risk factors in endometrial cancers, and to clarify the correlation between RLN metastasis and survival of patients with the disease. This analysis included 63 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent simultaneous pelvic lymph node (PLN) and paraaortic lymph node (PAN) dissection between April 1988 and December 1995. Patients with stage Ia grade 1 and stage IV disease were excluded from this analysis. Both PLN and PAN metastases were found in 10.0% (4/40) of patients with stage I (FIGO, 1988) disease. Of 14 cases with PLN metastases, 8 (57.1%) had PAN metastases simultaneously, whereas 4 (8.2%) of 49 cases without PLN metastases had PAN metastases. There was no significant relationship between the sites or numbers of positive PLN and PAN metastases. Multivariate analysis revealed that poor grade and deep myometrial invasion had an independent relationship with PAN metastases, whereas vascular space invasion and cervical invasion were independently associated with PLN metastases. When divided into the groups of stage I–II and stage III, the prognosis of patients with RLN metastases was significantly poorer than that of patients without RLN metastases in each stage. Furthermore, survival of patients with PAN metastases was significantly worse compared with that of patients with only PLN metastases (44.4 and 80.0%, respectively,P< 0.05). These results reveal that PLN and PAN metastases occur frequently even in early-stage endometrial cancer, and that RLN metastases, especially PAN metastases, have a serious impact on patient survival. In conclusion, systemically simultaneous pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy is essential for all the patients with endometrial cancer except those with stage Ia grade 1 and stage IV to provide prognostic information and select suitable postoperative treatment as well as to perform accurate FIGO staging, provided the condition of the patient permits.