Shear bond strength of luting agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative core materials
Background: Bonding properties of luting cements are important for retention of restorative core materials. The aim of this study was to compare the bonding performance of a resin‐modified glass ionomer cement and a self‐adhesive resin cement to various fixed prosthodontic core materials. Methods: ...
Saved in:
Published in | Australian dental journal Vol. 54; no. 4; pp. 334 - 340 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.12.2009
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background: Bonding properties of luting cements are important for retention of restorative core materials. The aim of this study was to compare the bonding performance of a resin‐modified glass ionomer cement and a self‐adhesive resin cement to various fixed prosthodontic core materials.
Methods: Cylindrical specimens with a thickness of 2 mm and a diameter of 5 mm were fabricated from Au‐Pd‐Ag, Co‐Cr, Ni‐Cr‐Mo, Ni‐Cr‐Fe alloys, titanium, zirconia and Empress II (n = 20). Each group was divided into two subgroups to be luted with two different luting agents. Composite resin blocks were cemented onto specimens with RelyXUnicem and FujiCem. A shear bond strength machine with 50 kg load cell and 0.50 mm/min crosshead speed was used. Kruskal Wallis test, Dunn’s Multiple Range test and Mann‐Whitney‐U test were used for statistical analysis. The results were evaluated in a confidence interval of p < 0.05.
Results: The highest bond strength was obtained between Ni‐Cr‐Fe‐RelyXUnicem (8.22 ± 2.15 MPa) and the lowest was between Empress II‐FujiCem (1.48 ± 0.9 MPa). In FujiCem groups, Co‐Cr and Ni‐Cr‐Fe showed significantly higher bond strength than Au‐Pd‐Ag and Empress II. In RelyX Unicem groups, Ni‐Cr‐Fe showed higher bond strength than Empress II.
Conclusions: The types of luting agents and restorative core materials may have a significant influence on bond strength. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0045-0421 1834-7819 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01159.x |