MRI-based brain volumetry in chronic whiplash patients: no evidence for traumatic brain injury

Introduction –  Cognitive complaints, such as poor concentration and memory deficits, are frequent after whiplash injury and play an important role in disability. The origin of these complaints is discussed controversially. Some authors postulate brain lesions as a consequence of whiplash injuries....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa neurologica Scandinavica Vol. 117; no. 1; pp. 49 - 54
Main Authors Sturzenegger, M., Radanov, B. P., Winter, P., Simko, M., Farra, A. D., Di Stefano, G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2008
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction –  Cognitive complaints, such as poor concentration and memory deficits, are frequent after whiplash injury and play an important role in disability. The origin of these complaints is discussed controversially. Some authors postulate brain lesions as a consequence of whiplash injuries. Potential diffuse axonal injury (DAI) with subsequent atrophy of the brain and ventricular expansion is of particular interest as focal brain lesions have not been documented so far in whiplash injury. Objective –  To investigate whether traumatic brain injury can be identified using a magnetic resonance (MR)‐based quantitative analysis of normalized ventricle–brain ratios (VBR) in chronic whiplash patients with subjective cognitive impairment that cannot be objectively confirmed by neuropsychological testing. Materials and methods –  MR examination was performed in 21 patients with whiplash injury and symptom persistence for 9 months on average and in 18 matched healthy controls. Conventional MR imaging (MRI) was used to assess the volumes of grey and white matter and of ventricles. The normalized VBR was calculated. Results –  The values of normalized VBR did not differ in whiplash patients when compared with that in healthy controls (F = 0.216, P = 0.645). Conclusions –  This study does not support loss of brain tissue following whiplash injury as measured by VBR. On this basis, traumatic brain injury with subsequent DAI does not seem to be the underlying mechanism for persistent concentration and memory deficits that are subjectively reported but not objectively verifiable as neuropsychological deficits.
Bibliography:istex:2AF48F5BEF2D52FE4CCA309502CE06FC9DC0B569
ark:/67375/WNG-SBLQDDQ6-G
ArticleID:ANE939
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0001-6314
1600-0404
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2007.00939.x