Diagnostic Performance of the GENEDIA MTB/NTM Detection Kit for Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Nontuberculous Mycobacteria With Sputum Specimens

The GENEDIA MTB/NTM Detection Kit (GENEDIA MTB/NTM; Green Cross Medical Science Corp., Chungbuk, Korea) is a multiplex real-time PCR assay used for differential identification of complex (MTBC) and nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). While the importance of differential identification of MTB/NTM is r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of laboratory medicine Vol. 40; no. 2; pp. 169 - 173
Main Authors Shin, Sunghwan, Yoo, In Young, Shim, Hyang Jin, Kang, On Kyun, Jhun, Byung Woo, Koh, Won Jung, Huh, Hee Jae, Lee, Nam Yong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine 01.03.2020
대한진단검사의학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The GENEDIA MTB/NTM Detection Kit (GENEDIA MTB/NTM; Green Cross Medical Science Corp., Chungbuk, Korea) is a multiplex real-time PCR assay used for differential identification of complex (MTBC) and nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). While the importance of differential identification of MTB/NTM is recognized, there is limited data on the performance of GENEDIA MTB/NTM assay to date. A total of 687 consecutive sputum specimens were cultured and analyzed with the GENEDIA MTB/NTM and GENEDIA MTB assays. Nineteen specimens (2.8%) were MTBC-positive, and 69 (10.0%) were NTM-positive based on mycobacterial culture. All specimens showed concordant results for MTBC using both assays, with a kappa value of 1.00, overall sensitivity of 63.2% (12/19), and specificity of 100% (668/668). The overall NTM sensitivity and specificity were 23.2% (16/69) and 99.7% (616/618) for GENEDIA MTB/NTM. The association between NTM-positivity using GENEDIA MTB/NTM and the diagnosis of NTM pulmonary disease was not statistically significant. In conclusion, the two real-time PCR assays showed similar diagnostic performance for MTBC detection. However, the sensitivity for NTM detection was lower than that for MTBC detection.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
These authors equally contributed to this study.
ISSN:2234-3806
2234-3814
DOI:10.3343/alm.2020.40.2.169