Word and picture identification : is representational parsimony possible?
Four experiments were conducted to evaluate the proposition that although prior exposure to a printed word facilitates identification of a corresponding picture, exposure to a picture does not facilitate subsequent word recognition (Durso and Johnson, 1979). Word identification was used, rather than...
Saved in:
Published in | Memory & cognition Vol. 14; no. 5; pp. 398 - 408 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Austin, TX
Psychonomic Society
01.09.1986
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Four experiments were conducted to evaluate the proposition that although prior exposure to a printed word facilitates identification of a corresponding picture, exposure to a picture does not facilitate subsequent word recognition (Durso and Johnson, 1979). Word identification was used, rather than naming latency, in order to avoid the range limitations in adult reading data. Word identification was facilitated by intermodal priming (prior exposure to a corresponding picture), although to a lesser extent than by intramodal (i.e. word word) priming; the magnitude of intermodal priming was insensitive to strategy; and, as with priming from spoken to printed language, the major impact of word frequency occurred under intermodal, as distinct from intramodal, conditions. Following Scarborough, Gerard, and Cortese (1979), a fifth experiment compared word identification and episodic recognition. Intramodal performance was superior in word identification, whereas intermodal (i.e. picture word) performance was superior in episodic recognition, a reversal which suggests that episodic recognition involves access to a distinct memory trace. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Memory and Cognition; v.14 n.5 p.398-408; September 1986 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0090-502X 1532-5946 |
DOI: | 10.3758/BF03197015 |