Baseline Ocular Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Initiation of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema

• Published in: Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging Vol. 50; no. 2; pp. 69 - 75
• Main Authors: Ansari, Waseem H, Han, Michael M, Haq, Siraj, Conti, Felipe F, Silva, Fabiana Q, Singh, Rishi P
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Slack, Inc 01.02.2019; SLACK INCORPORATED
• Subjects: Care and treatment; Clinical medicine; Clinical trials; Diabetes; Diabetic retinopathy; Dropsy; Edema; Exudation; Eye (anatomy); Glaucoma; Growth factors; Ischemia; Macular degeneration; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Patients; Pharmaceuticals; Retina; Studies; Thickness; Vascular endothelial growth factor; Visual acuity; Ohio; Cleveland Ohio; South San Francisco California; United States > US
• ISSN: 2325-8160; 2325-8179
• DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20190129-02

Patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) have variable anatomic and visual responses to anti-vascular endothelial growth (VEGF) treatments based on their presenting visual acuity (VA). The aim of study is to report the baseline ocular and imaging characteristics of patients presenting with DME who were treatment-naïve and who initiated anti-VEGF in routine clinical practice. Single-center, cross-sectional study of 638 patients. Subjects were divided into two VA groups: Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) less than 70 and ETDRS greater than 70 and ocular variables were compared between groups. Average central subfield thickness (CST) was 363.5 μm, cube volume was 11.7 mm , and cube average thickness (CAT) was 326.1 μm. Additionally, 21.5% had subretinal fluid (SRF), and 50.5% had hard exudates on presentation. Eyes with ETDRS less than 70 had greater CAT (338.5 μm vs. 313.2 μm ; P < .001), greater cube volume (12.2 mm vs. 11.3 mm ; P < .001), greater CST (383.5 μm vs. 350.0 μm; P < .001), and SRF (25.5% vs. 17.3%; P = .012). Furthermore, 7.64% had glaucoma, 1.3% had dry age-related macular degeneration, 4.5% of patients were vitrectomized, and 28.7% were pseudophakic. Regarding diabetic stage, 37% had proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and 63% presented with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. Patients presenting with ETDRS less than 70 were more likely to have a history of vitrectomy (7.1% vs. 1.9%, P = .002) and presence of PDR (42.3% vs. 31.4%, P = .004). The results describe a population of patients from a routine clinical practice not entirely represented in clinical trials, with key differences in ocular characteristics seen between VA groups. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019;50:69-75.].