Oral antioxidants improve leg blood flow during exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The consequence of elevated oxidative stress on exercising skeletal muscle blood flow as well as the transport and utilization of O 2 in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is not well understood. The present study examined the impact of an oral antioxidant cocktail (AOC) on l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology Vol. 309; no. 5; pp. H977 - H985
Main Authors Rossman, Matthew J., Trinity, Joel D., Garten, Ryan S., Ives, Stephen J., Conklin, Jamie D., Barrett-O'Keefe, Zachary, Witman, Melissa A. H., Bledsoe, Amber D., Morgan, David E., Runnels, Sean, Reese, Van R., Zhao, Jia, Amann, Markus, Wray, D. Walter, Richardson, Russell S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Physiological Society 01.09.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The consequence of elevated oxidative stress on exercising skeletal muscle blood flow as well as the transport and utilization of O 2 in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is not well understood. The present study examined the impact of an oral antioxidant cocktail (AOC) on leg blood flow (LBF) and O 2 consumption during dynamic exercise in 16 patients with COPD and 16 healthy subjects. Subjects performed submaximal (3, 6, and 9 W) single-leg knee extensor exercise while LBF (Doppler ultrasound), mean arterial blood pressure, leg vascular conductance, arterial O 2 saturation, leg arterial-venous O 2 difference, and leg O 2 consumption (direct Fick) were evaluated under control conditions and after AOC administration. AOC administration increased LBF (3 W: 1,604 ± 100 vs. 1,798 ± 128 ml/min, 6 W: 1,832 ± 109 vs. 1,992 ± 120 ml/min, and 9W: 2,035 ± 114 vs. 2,187 ± 136 ml/min, P < 0.05, control vs. AOC, respectively), leg vascular conductance, and leg O 2 consumption (3 W: 173 ± 12 vs. 210 ± 15 ml O 2 /min, 6 W: 217 ± 14 vs. 237 ± 15 ml O 2 /min, and 9 W: 244 ± 16 vs 260 ± 18 ml O 2 /min, P < 0.05, control vs. AOC, respectively) during exercise in COPD, whereas no effect was observed in healthy subjects. In addition, the AOC afforded a small, but significant, improvement in arterial O 2 saturation only in patients with COPD. Thus, these data demonstrate a novel beneficial role of AOC administration on exercising LBF, O 2 consumption, and arterial O 2 saturation in patients with COPD, implicating oxidative stress as a potential therapeutic target for impaired exercise capacity in this population.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0363-6135
1522-1539
DOI:10.1152/ajpheart.00184.2015