Evaluation of the confidential unit exclusion on Iranian blood donors: An 11-year experience

Background: Confidential unit exclusion (CUE) was recommended by the Food and Drug Administration to permit blood donors confidentially exclude their donation for transfusion. However, its effectiveness as a safety measure to the blood supply is debated. Aims: We, therefore, evaluated its benefit in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAsian journal of transfusion science Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 57 - 61
Main Authors Ameli, Mohammad, Hosseini, Seyed, Rad, Fariba, Sajjadi, Seyed
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ahmedabad Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd 01.01.2021
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Confidential unit exclusion (CUE) was recommended by the Food and Drug Administration to permit blood donors confidentially exclude their donation for transfusion. However, its effectiveness as a safety measure to the blood supply is debated. Aims: We, therefore, evaluated its benefit in identifying donors at risk of transmitting transfusion-transmissible infections (TTIs) and increasing blood safety in our population. Settings and Design: This was a cross-sectional and retrospective study. The study was performed at the South Khorasan Blood Transfusion Center. Materials and Methods: In this descriptive and retrospective study, data of CUE use and data of confirmed positive TTI markers were analyzed for the study period 2006-2016. Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 16. Results: Out of 165,267 donations, the CUE option was selected by 493 (0.3%) donors, most frequently by first-time blood donors, by men, by donors with <12 years schooling, and by 18-24-year-old donors. The data revealed that donations from CUE donors had no higher infection rates. Moreover, CUE showed low sensitivity (0.6%) and low positive predictive value (0.6%) in detecting TTI markers. Conclusion: The data do not provide any indication of a safety advantage from CUE; thus, we recommend that the procedure of CUE can be discontinued.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0973-6247
1998-3565
DOI:10.4103/ajts.AJTS_152_18