Evaluation of the confidential unit exclusion on Iranian blood donors: An 11-year experience
Background: Confidential unit exclusion (CUE) was recommended by the Food and Drug Administration to permit blood donors confidentially exclude their donation for transfusion. However, its effectiveness as a safety measure to the blood supply is debated. Aims: We, therefore, evaluated its benefit in...
Saved in:
Published in | Asian journal of transfusion science Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 57 - 61 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Ahmedabad
Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd
01.01.2021
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd Wolters Kluwer - Medknow Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background: Confidential unit exclusion (CUE) was recommended by the Food and Drug Administration to permit blood donors confidentially exclude their donation for transfusion. However, its effectiveness as a safety measure to the blood supply is debated.
Aims: We, therefore, evaluated its benefit in identifying donors at risk of transmitting transfusion-transmissible infections (TTIs) and increasing blood safety in our population.
Settings and Design: This was a cross-sectional and retrospective study. The study was performed at the South Khorasan Blood Transfusion Center.
Materials and Methods: In this descriptive and retrospective study, data of CUE use and data of confirmed positive TTI markers were analyzed for the study period 2006-2016.
Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 16.
Results: Out of 165,267 donations, the CUE option was selected by 493 (0.3%) donors, most frequently by first-time blood donors, by men, by donors with <12 years schooling, and by 18-24-year-old donors. The data revealed that donations from CUE donors had no higher infection rates. Moreover, CUE showed low sensitivity (0.6%) and low positive predictive value (0.6%) in detecting TTI markers.
Conclusion: The data do not provide any indication of a safety advantage from CUE; thus, we recommend that the procedure of CUE can be discontinued. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0973-6247 1998-3565 |
DOI: | 10.4103/ajts.AJTS_152_18 |