Building Dialogue on Complex Conservation Issues in a Conference Setting

• Published in: Conservation biology Vol. 28; no. 5; pp. 1428 - 1433
• Main Authors: ROCK, JENNY, SPARROW, ANDREW, WASS, ROB, MOLLER, HENRIK
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Blackwell Scientific Publications 01.10.2014; Blackwell Publishing Ltd; Wiley Periodicals Inc
• Subjects: Biodiversity; Biodiversity conservation; Blended learning; Blogging; Blogs; Communication; communications technology; Computer mediated communications; computer-mediated communication; Comunicación cara a cara; comunicación mediada por computadora; Conferences; conferencia científica; Congresses as Topic; Conservation biology; Conservation education; Conservation movement; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods; culture and humanities; dialogue; diálogo; Environmental conservation; face-to-face communication; open-space technology; Research Note; science conference; society; surveys; tecnología de espacio abierto; comunicación mediada por computadora; computer-mediated communication; diálogo; dialogue; conferencia científica; Comunicación cara a cara; science conference; tecnología de espacio abierto; open-space technology; face-to-face communication
• ISSN: 0888-8892; 1523-1739
• DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12339

Dialogue about complex science and society issues is important for contemporary conservation agendas. Conferences provide an appropriate space for such dialogue, but despite its recognized worth, best practices for facilitating active dialogue are still being explored. Face‐to‐face (FTF) and computer‐mediated communication (CMC) are two approaches to facilitating dialogue that have different strengths. We assessed the use of these approaches to create dialogue on cultural perspectives of conservation and biodiversity at a national ecology conference. In particular, we aimed to evaluate their potential to enhance dialogue through their integrated application. We used an interactive blog to generate CMC on participant‐sourced issues and to prime subsequent discussion in an FTF conference workshop. The quantity and quality of both CMC and FTF discussion indicated that both approaches were effective in building dialogue. Prior to the conference the blog averaged 126 views per day, and 44 different authors contributed a total of 127 comments. Twenty‐five participants subsequently participated in active FTF discussion during a 3‐h workshop. Postconference surveys confirmed that CMC had developed participants’ thinking and deepened FTF dialogue; 88% indicated specifically that CMC helped facilitate the FTF discussion. A further 83% of respondents concluded that preliminary blog discussion would be useful for facilitating dialogue at future conferences.