Intermittent androgen suppression in the LuCaP 23.12 prostate cancer xenograft model

BACKGROUND Intermittent androgen suppression (IAS) has been proposed as a method of delaying the onset of androgen‐independent growth in prostate cancer. While several pilot studies have demonstrated the feasibility of such a treatment, no study to date has defined the effect of IAS on survival. MET...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Prostate Vol. 43; no. 1; pp. 63 - 70
Main Authors Buhler, Kent R., Santucci, Richard A., Royai, Ramin A., Whitney, Sarah C., Vessella, Robert L., Lange, Paul H., Ellis, William J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.04.2000
Wiley-Liss
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND Intermittent androgen suppression (IAS) has been proposed as a method of delaying the onset of androgen‐independent growth in prostate cancer. While several pilot studies have demonstrated the feasibility of such a treatment, no study to date has defined the effect of IAS on survival. METHODS We developed an IAS protocol for mice bearing the LuCaP 23.12 human prostate cancer xenograft, with each cycle consisting of 1 week of androgen replacement with a testosterone pellet followed by 3 weeks of androgen withdrawal. Mice that responded to castration with a 40% or greater decrease in serum prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) were randomized to treatment with either continuous androgen suppression (CAS) or IAS. Serum PSA, tumor volume, and overall survival were monitored. RESULTS A total of 75 mice met the randomization criteria. There was no significant difference of survival between animals treated with CAS or IAS (185 vs. 239 days, P = 0.1835). Serum PSA showed evidence of cycling with hormonal manipulation. No cycling was noted in tumor volume. CONCLUSIONS IAS is not associated with a decrease in survival compared to CAS, yet in patients may offer quality‐of‐life improvements. Further studies of IAS in the setting of Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved clinical trials should be encouraged. Prostate 43:63–70, 2000. Published 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:George M. O'Brien Prostate Cancer Research Center - No. NIDDK 1 P50 DK/CA 47656-03
Richard M. Lucas Foundation
This article is a US Government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.
ArticleID:PROS9
istex:676AF5905A742BDEFBDE1AEA2D2C618EBB03E5E4
ark:/67375/WNG-LD7SS4DW-R
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0270-4137
1097-0045
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(20000401)43:1<63::AID-PROS9>3.0.CO;2-D