Comparison of Two Convection-Aided Protein Adsorption Methods Using Porous Membranes and Perfusion Beads

We describe results which serve as a guide in the selection of protein recovery techniques using two new chromatographic methods based on anion‐exchange interaction, i.e., membrane and perfusion chromatographies, which involve enhancement of protein transport by convective flow. Bovine serum albumin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiotechnology progress Vol. 12; no. 6; pp. 869 - 872
Main Authors Kubota, Noboru, Konno, Yoshitaka, Miura, Suguru, Saito, Kyoichi, Sugita, Kazuyuki, Watanabe, Kohei, Sugo, Takanobu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published USA American Chemical Society 1996
American Institute of Chemical Engineers
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We describe results which serve as a guide in the selection of protein recovery techniques using two new chromatographic methods based on anion‐exchange interaction, i.e., membrane and perfusion chromatographies, which involve enhancement of protein transport by convective flow. Bovine serum albumin solution was permeated through a functionalized porous hollow‐fiber membrane and a bed charged with functionalized porous (perfusion) beads of identical volume. The pores of the membrane are surrounded by grafted polymer chains immobilizing anion‐exchange groups, whereas the throughpores of the beads are surrounded by the diffusive pores at the periphery of which anion‐exchange groups are immobilized. An 8‐fold increase in throughput of the protein using the porous membrane, 37 mg of BSA/mL/min, was achieved at a low operating pressure of 0.1 MPa, compared to that using the perfusion bed.
Bibliography:ArticleID:BTPR960076
ark:/67375/WNG-RQ5LCH4V-F
istex:5DB4FFE98E365B0BA7DE89624787D4FA63A0E1A3
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:8756-7938
1520-6033
DOI:10.1021/bp960076s