Comparison of ropivacaine with bupivacaine and lidocaine for ilioinguinal block after ambulatory inguinal hernia repair in children

Summary Background : We have compared ropivacaine with bupivacaine and lidocaine for ilioinguinal block in thirty children undergoing ambulatory inguinal hernia repair. Methods : Patients were assigned randomly to receive 0.5 ml·kg−1 of 0.2% ropivacaine (Group R, n = 10), 0.25% bupivacaine (Group B,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPediatric anesthesia Vol. 14; no. 6; pp. 468 - 470
Main Authors Tsuchiya, Naohisa, Ichizawa, Manami, Yoshikawa, Yukiko, Shinomura, Tetsutaro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2004
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Background : We have compared ropivacaine with bupivacaine and lidocaine for ilioinguinal block in thirty children undergoing ambulatory inguinal hernia repair. Methods : Patients were assigned randomly to receive 0.5 ml·kg−1 of 0.2% ropivacaine (Group R, n = 10), 0.25% bupivacaine (Group B, n = 10) or 1% lidocaine (Group L, n = 10). The patients’ parents, who were not informed of the type of local anaesthetic employed, evaluated the postoperative pain at 2 h and 6 h after operation using the Wong–Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. Results : There was a significant difference in the face scale score between Group R and Group L, and Group B and Group L. There was no difference in the face scale score between Group R and Group B. There were no complications or clinical evidence of local anaesthetic toxicity. Conclusions : We have confirmed that bupivacaine and ropivacaine are more effective than lidocaine in the prevention of postoperative pain after children's inguinal hernia repair. We suggest that ropivacaine 0.2% is an alternative to bupivacaine 0.25% for ilioinguinal block in ambulatory paediatric surgery.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-H7C2TG6Q-9
ArticleID:PAN1234
istex:A90995D197494DB8B252B631C57D2BAAE369AB4C
ISSN:1155-5645
1460-9592
DOI:10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01234.x