Estimating model error covariances using particle filters

A method is presented for estimating the error covariance of the errors in the model equations in observation space. Estimating model errors in this systematic way opens up the possibility to use data assimilation for systematic model improvement at the level of the model equations, which would be a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inQuarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society Vol. 144; no. 713; pp. 1310 - 1320
Main Authors Zhu, Mengbin, van Leeuwen, Peter J., Zhang, Weimin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.04.2018
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A method is presented for estimating the error covariance of the errors in the model equations in observation space. Estimating model errors in this systematic way opens up the possibility to use data assimilation for systematic model improvement at the level of the model equations, which would be a huge step forward. This model error covariance is perhaps the hardest covariance matrix to estimate. It represents how the missing physics and errors in parametrizations manifest themselves at the scales the model can resolve. A new element is that we use an efficient particle filter to avoid the need to estimate the error covariance of the state as well, which most other data assimilation methods do require. Starting from a reasonable first estimate, the method generates new estimates iteratively during the data assimilation run, and the method is shown to converge to the correct model error matrix. We also investigate the influence of the accuracy of the observation error covariance on the estimation of the model error covariance and show that, when the observation errors are known, the model error covariance can be estimated well, but, as expected and perhaps unavoidably, the diagonal elements are estimated too low when the observation errors are estimated too high, and vice versa. Modelling detailed atmospheric physical processes, such as stratocumulus clouds, is extremely difficult, and present‐day parametrizations are failing. To improve the models one could add stochastic model errors. We use a fully nonlinear particle filter to estimate model error characteristics, avoiding the need also to estimate the state covariance.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0035-9009
1477-870X
DOI:10.1002/qj.3132