Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate has a substantial efficacy against multidrug-resistant strains of hepatitis B virus

Background & Aims To evaluate the efficacy of tenofovir in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with adefovir resistance (ADF‐R) and suboptimal response to adefovir (ADF‐S). Methods Nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)‐naïve patients and patients with previous adefovir failure receiving tenofovir therapy f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLiver international Vol. 35; no. 10; pp. 2265 - 2274
Main Authors Baran, Bulent, Soyer, Ozlem Mutluay, Ormeci, Asli Cifcibasi, Gokturk, Suut, Evirgen, Sami, Akyuz, Filiz, Karaca, Cetin, Demir, Kadir, Besisik, Fatih, Onel, Derya, Gulluoglu, Mine, Badur, Selim, Kaymakoglu, Sabahattin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.10.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background & Aims To evaluate the efficacy of tenofovir in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with adefovir resistance (ADF‐R) and suboptimal response to adefovir (ADF‐S). Methods Nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)‐naïve patients and patients with previous adefovir failure receiving tenofovir therapy for at least 6 months were included in the study. Biochemical and virological tests were obtained at baseline and 3‐month intervals in the first year and every 6 months thereafter. The primary outcome measure was complete virological response (CVR) (HBVDNA < 20 IU/ml). CVR rates were calculated by Kaplan–Meier analysis, and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was generated to find out factors independently associated with CVR. Results A total of 165 patients (118 men, mean age 42 ± 12, 64 HBeAg+) were included in the study. There were 105 patients in NA‐naïve, 32 patients in ADF‐S and 28 patients in ADF‐R groups. All patients in the ADF‐R group had multidrug resistance patterns. Mean duration of tenofovir treatment was 29 ± 14 months. CVR rates in NA‐naïve, ADF‐S and ADF‐R groups were 65% vs. 75% vs. 58% at 12th month, 77% vs. 87% vs. 79% at 24th month and 83% vs. 94% vs. 79% at 36th month respectively. According to multivariate Cox regression model, HBeAg positivity (HR = 0.56, 95%CI 0.36–0.86, P = 0.008), high baseline HBVDNA level (HR = 0.64, 95%CI 0.55–0.74, P < 0.001) and ADF‐R (HR = 0.47, 95%CI 0.28–0.81, P = 0.006) were independent predictors for CVR. Seven patients encountered mild renal dysfunction and were managed by dose adjustments. Conclusion CVR rates during the follow‐up show that tenofovir has a decreased, yet still potent in vivo efficacy against multidrug‐resistant strains of HBV.
Bibliography:ArticleID:LIV12831
istex:6A322AA1E4606C082772B0FA5522848182E53FB9
Fig. S1. Patient disposition figure.Fig. S2. Change in median HBVDNA levels (log10 IU/ml) in NA-naïve, ADF-S and ADF-R groups.Fig. S3. Cumulative ALT normalization rates in NA-naïve, ADF-S and ADF-R groups.Fig. S4. Cumulative HBeAg loss or seroconversion rates in NA-naïve, ADF-S and ADF-R groups.Table S1. Characteristics of chronic hepatitis B patients with multidrug resistance. Table S2. Frequency of baseline polymerase sequence mutations in patients with adefovir failure (n = 60).
ark:/67375/WNG-SPQW0Z2Q-V
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1478-3223
1478-3231
DOI:10.1111/liv.12831