Detroit Interventional Pain Assessment Scale: A Pain Score and Method for Measuring and Evaluating Post-Operative Pain Management—A Prospective Study

• Published in: Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Vol. 59; no. 11; p. 1976
• Main Authors: Boggs, Lauryn J, Stine, Sasha A, Boggs-Hughey, Barbara J, Geamanu, Andreea, Little, Bryan E, Darwiche, Hussein F, Vaidya, Rahul
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.11.2023
• Subjects: Bone surgery; Care and treatment; Classification; Cluster analysis; Health maintenance organizations; Measurement; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Methods; Morphine; morphine milligram equivalent; Narcotics; Opioids; orthopedic surgery; Orthopedics; Pain; pain assessment tools; Pain management; Pain, Postoperative; Patient satisfaction; Physicians; post-operative pain management; Postoperative period; Prescription writing; Statistical analysis; Surveys; Michigan; United States > US; Detroit Michigan
• ISSN: 1648-9144; 1010-660X; 1648-9144
• DOI: 10.3390/medicina59111976

Background and Objectives: Orthopedic surgeons commonly prescribe opioids, surpassing all medical specialties. Our objective was to develop a pain management scale that captures medication use, patient-reported pain scores, and helps orthopedic surgeons evaluate their post-operative prescribing practice. Materials and Methods: An IRB-approved prospective study followed 502 post-operative orthopedic surgery patients over a six-month period. All patients were surveyed in an orthopedic clinic at a Level 1 US Trauma Center, during a routine follow-up. Patient pain satisfaction was assessed using the validated Interventional Pain Assessment (IPA) scale, which uses three categories: 0 (no pain), 1 (tolerable pain), and 2 (intolerable pain). Daily narcotic use was translated to morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) using the Michigan Automated Prescription System (MAPS) narcotics registry. When patient pain satisfaction and narcotic usage were combined, this scale was called the Detroit Interventional Pain Assessment (DIPA) scale. Results: The five classes based on common prescription and usage of narcotics in this cohort include the following: A (no pain medication), B (over-the-counter medication), C (occasional use of short-acting narcotics 1–30 MMEs), D (consistent/regular use of short-acting narcotics 31–79 MMEs), and E (long-duration or stronger short-acting narcotics 80+ MMEs). Patients were most satisfied with their pain management at six weeks (80.5%) and three months (75.65%), and least satisfied at two weeks (62.5%) and six months (60.9%). Additional information displayed on the DIPA graph revealed there was a significant decrease in the percentage of patients on narcotics at two weeks (65.2%) to six months (32.6%) at p < 0.001. Conclusions: The DIPA pain scale shows the relationship between patient pain perception and opioid prescription/usage, while also tracking prescriber tendencies. Providers were able to visualize their post-operative pain management progression at each designated clinic visit with corresponding alphabetical daily MME categories. In this study, results suggest that surgeons were not effective at managing the pain of patients at two weeks post-operative, which is attributed to an inadequate number of pain pills prescribed upon discharge. Overall, the DIPA graph signaled that better pain management interventions are necessitated in periods with lower efficiency scores.