Scope and Nature of Pain- and Analgesia-Related Content of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)

Abstract Background “The ongoing opioid crisis lies at the intersection of two substantial public health challenges—reducing the burden of suffering from pain and containing the rising toll of the harms that can result from the use of opioid medications” [1]. Improved pain education for health care...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPain medicine (Malden, Mass.) Vol. 19; no. 3; pp. 449 - 459
Main Authors Fishman, Scott M, Carr, Daniel B, Hogans, Beth, Cheatle, Martin, Gallagher, Rollin M, Katzman, Joanna, Mackey, Sean, Polomano, Rosemary, Popescu, Adrian, Rathmell, James P, Rosenquist, Richard W, Tauben, David, Beckett, Laurel, Li, Yueju, Mongoven, Jennifer M, Young, Heather M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 01.03.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background “The ongoing opioid crisis lies at the intersection of two substantial public health challenges—reducing the burden of suffering from pain and containing the rising toll of the harms that can result from the use of opioid medications” [1]. Improved pain education for health care providers is an essential component of the multidimensional response to both still-unmet challenges [2,3]. Despite the importance of licensing examinations in assuring competency in health care providers, there has been no prior appraisal of pain and related content within the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE). Methods An expert panel developed a novel methodology for characterizing USMLE questions based on pain core competencies and topical and public health relevance. Results Under secure conditions, raters used this methodology to score 1,506 questions, with 28.7% (432) identified as including the word “pain.” Of these, 232 questions (15.4% of the 1,506 USMLE questions reviewed) were assessed as being fully or partially related to pain, rather than just mentioning pain but not testing knowledge of its mechanisms and their implications for treatment. The large majority of questions related to pain (88%) focused on assessment rather than safe and effective pain management, or the context of pain. Conclusions This emphasis on assessment misses other important aspects of safe and effective pain management, including those specific to opioid safety. Our findings inform ways to improve the long-term education of our medical and other graduates, thereby improving the health care of the populations they serve.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Funding sources: No payment for participation and/or honoraria was provided for any of the review panelists. In-kind salary support for SMF and JMM was provided by the Division of Pain Medicine in the School of Medicine and the Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing at the University of California, Davis, as well as the cost of two dinner meetings during the two-day onsite review. The Mayday Fund provided a grant to support air and train transportation expenses and two nights’ lodging in a hotel near the NBME headquarters in Philadelphia for panelists and the single staff organizer (JMM). The NBME provided two meals per day for panelists during the two-day review. Some panelists resided in Philadelphia and did not require travel or lodging reimbursement. All other expenses (such as airport transfer, additional food, or lodging) were not covered.
ISSN:1526-2375
1526-4637
DOI:10.1093/pm/pnx336