Effect assessment of engineered nanoparticles in solid media – Current insight and the way forward

Engineered Nanoparticles (ENPs) present novel/added challenges to the established effect assessment modus operandi, requiring an update of used methods. ENPs are dimensionally and physically different from conventional chemicals, which imply that the metrics with which we relate effect and the type...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironmental pollution (1987) Vol. 218; pp. 1370 - 1375
Main Authors Amorim, Mónica J.B., Roca, Carlos P., Scott-Fordsmand, Janeck J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.11.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Engineered Nanoparticles (ENPs) present novel/added challenges to the established effect assessment modus operandi, requiring an update of used methods. ENPs are dimensionally and physically different from conventional chemicals, which imply that the metrics with which we relate effect and the type of effect responses are different from that of the conventional approach. Effects on organisms are often preceded by changes on the sub-organismal level (cell, genes), dedicated tools have vast potential to detect earlier (and link to) effects on higher levels of organization. High-throughput screening (HTS) is rapid, cost-effective and specific. One way forward is to link HTS to population outcomes, targeting a systems toxicology approach. Although the benefits of integrating various levels of information may seem obvious, this is an even more decisive aspect when rapid answers are needed for ENPs. Here we rank the available tools/methods, highlight main study gaps and list priority needs and the way forward. Outlining challenges of effect assessment of nanomaterials: study gaps and priority needs for the way forward.
ISSN:0269-7491
1873-6424
DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2015.08.048