Accelerated Aging in LMNA Mutations Detected by Artificial Intelligence ECG-Derived Age

• Published in: Mayo Clinic proceedings Vol. 98; no. 4; p. 522
• Main Authors: Shelly, Shahar, Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco, Chacin-Suarez, Audry, Cohen-Shelly, Michal, Medina-Inojosa, Jose R, Kapa, Suraj, Attia, Zachi, Chahal, Anwar A, Somers, Virend K, Friedman, Paul A, Milone, Margherita
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01.04.2023
• Subjects: Artificial Intelligence; Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis; Electrocardiography; Humans; Lamin Type A - genetics; Mutation
• ISSN: 1942-5546
• DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.11.020

To demonstrate early aging in patients with lamin A/C (LMNA) gene mutations after hypothesizing that they have a biological age older than chronological age, as such a finding impacts care. We applied a previously trained convolutional neural network model to predict biological age by electrocardiogram (ECG) [Artificial Intelligence (AI)-ECG age] to LMNA patients evaluated by multiple ECGs from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2019. The age gap was the difference between chronological age and AI-ECG age. Findings were compared with age-/sex-matched controls. Thirty-one LMNA patients who had a total of 271 ECGs were studied. The median age at symptom onset was 22 years (range, <1-53 years; n=23 patients); eight patients were asymptomatic family members carrying the LMNA mutation. Cardiac involvement was detected by ECG and echocardiogram in 16 patients and consisted of ventricular arrhythmias (13), atrial fibrillation (12), and cardiomyopathy (6). Four patients required cardiac transplantation. Fourteen patients had neurological manifestations, mainly muscular dystrophy. LMNA mutation carriers, including asymptomatic carriers, were 16 years older by AI-ECG than non-LMNA carriers, suggesting accelerated biological age. Most LMNA patients had an age gap of more than 10 years, compared with controls (P<.001). Consecutive AI-ECG analysis showed accelerated aging in the LMNA group compared with controls (P<.0001). There were no significant differences in age-gap among LMNA patients based on phenotype. AI-ECG predicted that LMNA patients have a biological age older than chronological age and accelerated aging even in the absence of cardiac abnormalities by traditional methods. Such a finding could translate into early medical intervention and serve as a disease biomarker.