Environmental regulation and environmental productivity: The case of China

Constrained by the dual mission of supporting industrial growth and reducing emissions, China׳s traditional, emission reduction-oriented environmental policies unavoidably face a dilemma. This study adopts the GML index to calculate China׳s industrial productivity by considering environmental factor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRenewable & sustainable energy reviews Vol. 62; pp. 758 - 766
Main Authors Wang, Yan, Shen, Neng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2016
Subjects
Control
Emission analysis
Emissions control
Environmental productivity
Environmental regulation
Global Malmquist Luenberge
Heterogeneity
Mathematical analysis
Missions
Policies
Productivity
China, People's Rep
Environmental regulation
Environmental productivity
Global Malmquist Luenberge
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1364-0321
1879-0690
DOI10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.048

Cover

More Information
Summary:Constrained by the dual mission of supporting industrial growth and reducing emissions, China׳s traditional, emission reduction-oriented environmental policies unavoidably face a dilemma. This study adopts the GML index to calculate China׳s industrial productivity by considering environmental factors. In addition, based on the assumption of industry heterogeneity, the author examines the non-linear relationship between China׳s environmental regulation and environmental productivity and calculated the optimal regulation environment for industries. According to this study, when impact of undesirable outputs (pollutant emissions) is considered, environmental regulation and environmental productivity are positively correlated, which to some degree validates the Porter Hypothesis. At present, environmental regulation has significant positive effects on clean production industries but shows a lag effect on pollution-intensive industries. The degree of environmental regulation and environmental productivity show an “inverted U”-shaped relation and display three thresholds. It should be noted, however, that the relationship between regulation and productivity may vary across industries. These findings have clear policy implications: rather than continually increasing the level of environmental regulation, the government should establish standards for individual industries that emphasize flexibility.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1364-0321
1879-0690
DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.048