The Double-Lumen Irrigation-Suction Tube in The Management of Incisional Surgical Site Infection After Enterocutaneous Fistula Excisions: An Observational Study

• Published in: Journal of investigative surgery Vol. 34; no. 7; pp. 791 - 797
• Main Authors: Yao, Zheng, Tian, Weiliang, Xu, Xin, Zhao, Risheng, Huang, Ming, Zhao, Yunzhao, Chen, Xinhao
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Taylor & Francis 09.08.2021; Taylor & Francis Group
• Subjects: double-lumen irrigation-suction tube; enterocutaneous fistula; excisions; Humans; Intestinal Fistula - etiology; Intestinal Fistula - surgery; Management; Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy; observational study; Retrospective Studies; Suction; surgical site infection; Surgical Wound Infection - etiology; Surgical Wound Infection - therapy; enterocutaneous fistula; Management; double-lumen irrigation-suction tube; excisions; surgical site infection; observational study
• ISSN: 0894-1939; 1521-0553
• DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2019.1693667

This study aimed to investigate the effect of double-lumen irrigation-suction tube (DLIST) in the management of surgical site infections (SSIs) after enterocutaneous fistula (ECF) excisions. From January 2016 to December 2017 medical records of patients with ECF excisions were reviewed. Patients with primary superficial SSI were divided into group a (treated with DLIST) and b (treated with delayed primary closures). Patients with primary deep SSI were divided into group A (treated with DLIST) and B (treated with vacuum-assisted closure [VAC]). The effect of the DLIST was evaluated. There were 32 in group a and 27 in group b. The therapeutic time and cost in group a were lower (13.13 ± 2.37 d vs. 24.89 ± 7.44 d; p < .001; $1456 ± 302 vs.$2784 ± 583; p < .001). There were 21 in group A and 23 in group B. While the therapeutic time of group A was longer, the cost was lower ($1717 ± 404 vs. $2636 ± 592; p < .001). Placing DLIST is an effective and cheap method to treat superficial SSI after ECF excisions. The cost of DLIST in treatment of deep SSI is lower, while the effect of VAC is better.