Laparoscopic surgery: A randomised controlled trial comparing intraoperative hemodynamic parameters and arterial-blood gas changes at two different pneumoperitoneal pressure values

The benefits of laparoscopic surgery are well known. However, clinic and metabolic consequences of pneumoperitoneum, achieved by insufflation of gas carbon dioxide, are still debated. Cardiovascular system suffering due to the compression of intra-abdominal venous structures can cause life-threateni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of medicine and surgery Vol. 81; p. 104562
Main Authors Eva, Intagliata, Rosario, Vecchio, Guglielmo, Rosolia, Clarissa, Vizzini, Federica, Lo Presti, Emma, Cacciola, Rosaria, Cacciola Rossella, Veronica, Vecchio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2022
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The benefits of laparoscopic surgery are well known. However, clinic and metabolic consequences of pneumoperitoneum, achieved by insufflation of gas carbon dioxide, are still debated. Cardiovascular system suffering due to the compression of intra-abdominal venous structures can cause life-threatening complications. Increased partial pressure of carbon dioxide induces metabolic acidosis with further vascular suffering. Pneumoperitoneum reduces the pulmonary exchange volumes and bring renal suffering. The aim of this study is to evaluate the alterations in hemodynamic and hemogasanalysis parameters during the laparoscopic surgery at different pressure settings of pneumoperitoneum in order to assess the best pressure value. We evaluated and compared intraoperative hemodynamic and hemogasanalytic alterations in two groups of patients respectively subdue to laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a pneumoperitoneum pressure of 12 mmHg (group A) and at a pressure of 8 mmHg (group B). In both groups, after the induction of anesthesia we observed a flexion in the heart rate, with no significant difference between the two groups. During the intervention, group A showed a significantly higher respiratory rate than the group B. The average blood pressure decreased mostly in group B. The oxygen saturation increased at the end of the procedure in group A, more than in the group B. The pH value was higher in group B. The hydrogen carbonate ion settled at lower levels in group A. Although significant differences between the two groups were appreciated on several parameters, they were never of such magnitude to prefer the induction of pneumoperitoneum at 8 mmHg. •Pneumoperitoneum induces hemogasanalytic and hemodynamic alterations.•Different settings in pneumoperitoneum pressure cause different levels of hemodynamic and hemogasanalytic alterations.•A pneumoperitoneum pressure value that could conciliate either the reduced alterations in hemodynamic and hemogasanalytic parameters and the surgeon's needs for surgical intervention and safety, has to be established.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2049-0801
2049-0801
DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104562