Clinical significance of lung cross-sectional area measured by computed tomography in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: The correlation with pulmonary hemodynamics and the limitations

The percentage cross-sectional area of the lung under five (%CSA ) is the percentage of pulmonary vessels with <5 mm area relative to the total lung area on computed tomography (CT). The extent that %CSA is related to pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypert...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPulmonary circulation Vol. 13; no. 3; pp. e12287 - n/a
Main Authors Kuriyama, Ayaka, Kasai, Hajime, Sugiura, Toshihiko, Nagata, Jun, Naito, Akira, Sekine, Ayumi, Shigeta, Ayako, Sakao, Seiichiro, Ishida, Keiichi, Matsumiya, Goro, Tanabe, Nobuhiro, Suzuki, Takuji
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.07.2023
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The percentage cross-sectional area of the lung under five (%CSA ) is the percentage of pulmonary vessels with <5 mm area relative to the total lung area on computed tomography (CT). The extent that %CSA is related to pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is unclear, as is the effect of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) on %CSA . Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of %CSA in patients with CTEPH. We studied 98 patients (64 females, mean age 62.5 ± 11.9 years), who underwent CT with %CSA measurement and right heart catheterization (RHC). Patients were classified into groups based on eligibility for PEA. We compared the %CSA with pulmonary hemodynamics measured by RHC in various groups. In 38 patients who underwent PEA, the relationship between %CSA and pulmonary hemodynamics was also evaluated before and after PEA. Significant correlations between %CSA and pulmonary vascular resistance, and compliance, and pulmonary artery pulse pressure were observed in all patients. Pulmonary hemodynamics in the patients who underwent or were eligible for PEA showed a significant correlation with %CSA . Additionally, %CSA was significantly lower in the postoperative than in the preoperative group. There was no correlation between changes in %CSA and pulmonary hemodynamics before and after PEA. Furthermore, %CSA did not correlate significantly with prognosis. %CSA may reflect pulmonary hemodynamics in CTEPH with central thrombosis. Furthermore, %CSA was reduced by PEA postoperatively. However, %CSA is not a prognostic indicator, its clinical usefulness in CTEPH patients is limited, and further validation is required.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2045-8932
2045-8940
2045-8940
DOI:10.1002/pul2.12287