Physical and thermal properties of blood storage bags: implications for shipping frozen components on dry ice

BACKGROUND: Frozen blood components are shipped on dry ice. The lower temperature (–70°C in contrast to usual storage at –30°C) and shipping conditions may cause a rent in the storage bag, breaking sterility and rendering the unit useless. The rate of loss can reach 50 to 80 percent. To identify tho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTransfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) Vol. 42; no. 7; pp. 836 - 846
Main Authors Hmel, Peter J., Kennedy, Anthony, Quiles, John G., Gorogias, Martha, Seelbaugh, Joseph P., Morrissette, Craig R., Van Ness, Kenneth, Reid, T.J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Boston, MA, USA Blackwell Publishing, Inc 01.07.2002
Blackwell Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND: Frozen blood components are shipped on dry ice. The lower temperature (–70°C in contrast to usual storage at –30°C) and shipping conditions may cause a rent in the storage bag, breaking sterility and rendering the unit useless. The rate of loss can reach 50 to 80 percent. To identify those bags with lower probability of breaking during shipment, the thermal and physical properties of blood storage bags were examined. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood storage bags were obtained from several manufacturers and were of the following compositions: PVC with citrate, di‐2‐ethylhexylphthalate (DEHP), or tri‐2‐ethylhexyl‐tri‐mellitate (TEHTM) plasticizer; polyolefin (PO); poly(ethylene‐co‐ vinyl acetate) (EVA); or fluorinated polyethylene propylene (FEP). The glass transition temperature (Tg) of each storage bag was determined. Bag thickness and measures of material strength (tensile modulus [MT] and time to achieve 0.5 percent strain [T0.5%]) were evaluated. MT and T0.5% measurements were made at 25 and –70°C. Response to applied force at –70°C was measured using an impact testing device and a drop test. RESULTS: The Tg of the bags fell into two groups: 70 to 105°C (PO, FEP) and –50 to –17°C (PVC with plasticizer, EVA). Bag thickness ranged from 0.14 to 0.41 mm. Compared to other materials, the ratios of MT and T0.5% for PVC bags were increased (p ≤ 0.001) indicating that structural changes for PVC were more pronounced upon cooling from 25 to −70°C. Bags containing EVA were more shock resistant, resulting in the lowest rate of breakage (10% breakage) when compared with PO (60% breakage, p = 0.0573) or PVC (100% breakage, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Blood storage bags made of EVA appear better suited for shipping frozen blood components on dry ice and are cost‐effective replacements for PVC bags. For the identification of blood storage bags meeting specific storage requirements, physical and thermal analyses of blood storage bags may be useful and remove empiricism from the process.
Bibliography:istex:F1721F402759C46443A276D074CD42ED2106EEF5
ArticleID:t01x
ark:/67375/WNG-Q10BCB47-M
DEHP = di‐2‐ethylhexylphthalate; EVA = poly(ethylene‐covinyl acetate); FEP = fluorinated ethylene propylene; FRBC(s) = frozen RBC(s); PBPC(s) = peripheral blood progenitor cell(s); PO = polyolefin; TEHTM = tri‐2‐ethylhexyl‐tri‐mellitate; Tg = glass transition temperature.
Supported by the Trauma Management Program, Medical Research and Materiel Command, US Army. The opinions expressed herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.
ABBREVIATIONS
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0041-1132
1537-2995
DOI:10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00135.x